06 The Silent Collapse: When Order Gives Way to Chaos

The city carried its guilt like a shadow, stretching long and dark across the land. Isaiah’s words hung heavy in the air, accusing without mercy: “For Jerusalem has stumbled and Judah has fallen.” Their rebellion was not whispered but shouted, displayed openly like wounds they refused to bind.

One by one, the pillars of order crumbled. The wise were plucked away, leaving behind a void that could not be filled. Children ascended to thrones, their small hands trembling under the weight of authority they did not understand. Disarray spread like a contagion—neighbors devouring neighbors, the young mocking the old, the base rising above the honorable.

And then there were the women, adorned in garb so ostentatious it seemed to mock the very fabric of existence. Their laughter rang hollow, echoing off walls soon to crumble. When the end came, it arrived without fanfare, a silent collapse into desolation. The gates stood empty, the streets barren, and the city itself sat upon the ground, stripped of meaning, waiting for oblivion.

Action Step

Spend time in prayer or meditation, asking God to reveal any ways you’ve contributed to disorder in your relationships, workplace, or community. Then, commit to restoring order through reconciliation, honesty, or acts of service.

National Sins And National Judgments

What follows is the original text of this sermon with headings added to enhance structure and readability.

Part 1: Introduction

Isaiah 3:8-9 For Jerusalem has stumbled and Judah has fallen, Because their speech and their actions are against the Lord, To rebel against His glorious presence. The expression of their faces bears witness against them, And they display their sin like Sodom; They do not even conceal it. Woe to them! For they have brought evil on themselves.

First, Here is a confluence of sins delighted in.

Secondly, Here is a concurrence of various judgments unregarded. In the ninth chapter of this prophecy, the prophet enumerates, from the 13th verse to the end of the chapter, all sorts of judgments and indications of the continuance of God’s displeasure, concluding every one of them with this: “For all this his anger is not turned away, but his hand is stretched out still;” and it will end in their utter destruction.

Thirdly, Here are the preparative causes of ruin, that which would dispose Jerusalem and Judah to ruin and destruction. There are five of them reckoned up in this chapter:

1.When God takes away the good, the sober, the understanding part of a nation, and leaves a nation very thin of such kind of persons: 

Isaiah 3:1-3, “Behold, the Lord, the Lord of hosts, doth take away from Jerusalem and from Judah the stay and the staff, the whole stay of bread, and the whole stay of water, the mighty man, and the man of war, the judge, and the prophet, and the prudent, and the ancient, the captain of fifty, and the honourable man, and the counsellor, and the cunning artificer, and the eloquent orator.”

When God makes a nation thin of such persons, it is a preparation and disposition to their ruin.

2.Weakness in their government is another preparation and disposition:

Isaiah 3:4 “And I will give children to be their princes, and babes shall rule over them.” 

3.Horrible disorder in the minds of men, and contempt of God’s order, that should be among them:

Isaiah 3:5 “And the people shall be oppressed, every one by another, and every one by his neighbour: the child shall behave himself proudly against the ancient, and the base against the honourable.”

4.When there is great oppression and persecution:

Isaiah 3:12 “As for my people, children are their oppressors, and women rule over them.”

And what did they do?

Isaiah 3:14-15 “Ye have eaten up the vineyard; the spoil of the poor is in your houses. What mean ye that ye beat my people to pieces, and grind the faces of the poor? saith the Lord God of hosts.”

Isaiah 3:14-15 The Lord enters into judgment with the elders and princes of His people, “It is you who have devoured the vineyard; The plunder of the poor is in your houses. What do you mean by crushing My people And grinding the face of the poor?” Declares the Lord God of hosts.

5.And, lastly, there is horrible pride, and especially the pride of vain and foolish women; which the prophet insists upon from verse 16 to the very last words of the chapter, and concludes,

Isaiah 3:26 “Thy men shall fall by the sword, and thy mighty in the war. And her gates shall lament and mourn; and she being desolate shall sit upon the ground.”

This is the end of it all. So that you have an account of what are those causes whereon God in His Word doth pronounce cities and nations to be ruined and destroyed, even then when they stand in their fullest security, in their own opinion.

Pray Thus

Inspired by Psalms 79 Lament over the Destruction of Jerusalem, and Prayer for Help. A guiding framework for every nation and people to use in their prayers.

O God, the nations have invaded Your inheritance;

They have defiled Your holy temple;

They have laid Albuquerque in ruins.

They have given the dead bodies of Your servants for food to the birds of the heavens,

The flesh of Your godly ones to the beasts of the earth.

They have poured out their blood like water round about New Mexico;

And there was no one to bury them.

.

We have become a reproach to our neighbors,

A scoffing and derision to those around us.

How long, O Lord? Will You be angry forever?

Will Your jealousy burn like fire?

.

Pour out Your wrath upon the nations which do not know You,

And upon the kingdoms which do not call upon Your name.

For they have devoured Japheth

And laid waste his habitation.

Do not remember the iniquities of our forefathers against us;

Let Your compassion come quickly to meet us,

For we are brought very low.

Help us, O God of our salvation, for the glory of Your name;

And deliver us and forgive our sins for Your name’s sake.

Why should the nations say, “Where is their God?”

Let there be known among the nations in our sight,

Vengeance for the blood of Your servants which has been shed.

Let the groaning of the prisoner come before You;

According to the greatness of Your power preserve those who are doomed to die.

And return to our neighbors sevenfold into their bosom

The reproach with which they have reproached You, O Lord.

So we Your people and the sheep of Your pasture

Will give thanks to You forever;

To all generations we will tell of Your praise.

Style ofParaphrase
PART 1
J. Steinbeck01 The Quiet Collapse: Lessons From A Nation’s Fall
E. Hemingway02 Unflinching Truth: The Harsh Reality of National Sins
J. Lahiri03 Threads of Decay: How Nations Unravel Slowly But Surely
A. Christie04 Clues to Collapse: Solving the Mystery of a Nation’s Downfall
M. Twain05 A Heap o’ Trouble: What Happens When We Mock God’s Warnings
F. Kafka06 The Silent Collapse: When Order Gives Way to Chaos
PART 2
J. Steinbeckdue 04/22/25
E. Hemingway

.

8 Friendship, Dating, And Marriage

Male & Female Differences Part 1

Summary

The lesson explores the inherent differences between men and women, emphasizing that these differences are rooted in creation rather than culture. It argues that while men and women are equal in essence, they differ in function, which can lead to misunderstandings and conflicts, especially in marriage. The lesson highlights that women often have a maternal instinct and emotional sensitivity, while men are more solution-oriented and less emotionally expressive. These differences, if not understood and appreciated, can result in frustration and resentment. The teacher encourages mutual understanding and acceptance of these differences to foster healthier relationships, particularly within a Christian context.

Test Your Knowledge

Scrolling down slowly will hide the answer until you can make your choice.

1.What does Eggerich argue is the source of male and female differences?
A.Cultural conditioning
B.Educational influences
C.Divine creation
D.Social expectations

Answer: C

.

2.According to Eggerich, how do women generally process problems?
A.By ignoring them
B.By seeking facts
C.By expressing and exploring feelings
D.By delegating them

Answer: C

.

3.What Bible verse does Eggerich use to emphasize the husband’s responsibility toward his wife?
A.Genesis 2:24
B.Proverbs 31:10
C.1 Peter 3:7
D.Matthew 19:6

Answer:

.

4.How does Eggerich describe men’s general orientation in conversation?
A.Emotionally driven
B.Detail-oriented
C.Fact-based and solution-driven
D.Non-verbal

Answer: C

.

5.What does Eggerich caution against when using the material in his talk?
A.Quoting too much Scripture
B.Applying it in a workplace setting
C.Using it to justify personal shortcomings
D.Sharing it outside Christian circles

Answer: C

.

6.According to the lesson, why do men often fail to listen to their wives’ input during decision-making?
A.Because wives always demand immediate action
B.Because wives provide too many statistical details
C.Because wives often express feelings without providing reasons
D.Because wives are generally unreasonable

Answer: C

.

7.What is one reason the lesson gives for why women might feel intimidated in a marriage?
A.Men constantly offer sympathy
B.Men focus too much on external appearances
C.Men are overly sensitive to criticism
D.Men prioritize theological discussions

Answer: B

.

8.How does the lesson describe the typical communication style of women?
A.Abstract and theoretical
B.Focused on facts and figures
C.People-oriented and emotional
D.Solution-oriented and direct

Answer: C

.

9.What does the lesson suggest is a common mistake men make in interpreting their wives’ words?
A.Assuming they are always literal
B.Ignoring their emotional weight
C.Believing they are always truthful
D.Thinking they are irrelevant

Answer: B

.

Outline

I.Introduction and Cultural Resistance to Differences
A.Familiarity breeds indifference.
B.Denial of gender differences in modern culture.
II.Equal Essence, Different Functions
A.Distinction is not inequality.
B.Scriptural basis for gender roles.
III.Emotional and Functional Traits
A.Maternal instinct and emotional sensitivity in women.
B.Rationality and abstract thinking in men.
IV.Challenges in the Workplace
A.Women in business and emotional suppression.
B.Hostility versus femininity in professional environments.
V.Communication Styles
A.Women use language to express feelings; men, facts.
B.Conflict arises from misinterpreting conversational motives.
VI.Marriage and Misunderstandings
A.Miscommunication and unmet expectations.
B.Decision-making differences and trust.
VII.Biblical Admonitions
A.1 Peter 3:7 and Ephesians 5: instructions for spouses.
B.Christ-church parallel in marital roles.
VIII.Practical Illustrations of Differences
A.Directions, abstract thought, emotional hurt, and problem-solving.
IX.Response and Responsibility
A.Importance of personal responsibility in emotional reactions.
B.Anger as a revelation of internal disposition.
X.Conclusion and Purpose of Differences
A.Differences are meant to complement and sanctify.
B.Final encouragement for understanding and unity.

.

Outline 2

I.Introduction: The Importance of Understanding Male-Female Differences
II.Cultural Misunderstandings About Gender Roles
III.Biblical Perspective on Male-Female Differences
IV.General Trends in Male and Female Behavior
A.Decision-making
B.Problem-solving
C.Communication styles
V.Practical Implications for Marriage
VI.Conclusion: Embracing Differences as Complementary

.

The Lesson

INSERTAUDIO

Here is a list of questions that will be answered:

Study Guide

1.Why does Eggerich argue that gender differences are rooted in creation rather than culture?

The lesson suggests that modern culture often advocates for no differences between men and women, leading to confusion and conflict, especially in roles like motherhood and business. This cultural push sometimes causes women to adopt hostile behaviors to succeed in traditionally male-dominated environments. The cultural intimidation on college campuses is highlighted, where expressing a desire to be a wife and mother is met with verbal abuse and criticism. Additionally, the lesson notes that while there is a valid emphasis on women having different functions and roles, the cultural trend sometimes pushes women to become something other than what they naturally are, resulting in widespread unhappiness. Men in business also report that women often maintain a level of hostility to function effectively, as their natural sensitivity makes them vulnerable to hurt, which they convert into anger to cope. This hostility, however, clashes with the natural dynamics between men and women, leading to further tension and misunderstanding.

.

2.How does emotional sensitivity manifest differently between men and women according to the lesson?

According to the lesson, emotional sensitivity manifests differently between men and women in several key ways:

1.Women are described as having greater emotional sensitivity and vulnerability compared to men. Eggerich cites 1 Peter 3:7, which refers to wives as the “weaker vessel” – not intellectually or physically weaker, but emotionally more vulnerable.
2.Women tend to be more people-oriented and relate conversations to individuals, whereas men are more idea-oriented and abstract in their thinking. This makes women more sensitive to personal implications of discussions.
3.Words hurt women far more than men because women take things very personally due to their people-orientation. Eggerich notes that for women, “words and actions are synonymous,” meaning words have as much impact as physical actions.
4.Women have difficulty hiding their feelings when talking, while men can conceal emotions and focus on communicating facts.
5.Women talk from the heart to express and discover feelings, using conversation as an experience. Men, on the other hand, talk primarily to communicate facts and information.
6.When criticized at work, men may come home and tell their wives, but women take such criticism much more personally, having a harder time with grudges because “the man she loves has been offended and hurt.”
7.Women are portrayed as needing to talk about their feelings as a way of processing them, while men only talk when they have something specific to communicate.

In essence, the lesson portrays women as generally more emotionally sensitive and expressive than men across various forms of communication and interaction, with a greater tendency to internalize and be affected by words and perceived slights.

.

3.What role does Eggerich suggest communication plays in marital conflict?

According to Eggerich’s analysis in the lesson, communication plays a central role in marital conflict, particularly due to fundamental differences in how men and women communicate. He suggests several key points about these communication differences and their impact on marital relationships:

1.Men are idea-oriented and abstract in their communication, while women are people-oriented and concrete. This difference often leads to misunderstandings, as men tend to discuss concepts without relating them to individuals, whereas women naturally connect conversations to people.
2.Words have much greater emotional weight for women than for men. Eggerich states that “words and actions are synonymous” for many women, meaning they experience words as having similar impact to physical actions. This makes women far more sensitive to verbal criticism or perceived slights.
3.Women use conversation primarily to express and discover feelings, while men use it mainly to communicate facts and information. This difference in purpose can lead to frustration on both sides – wives may feel their husbands aren’t emotionally present, while husbands may view their wives’ emotional discussions as unnecessary.
4.Men can typically hide their emotions while communicating facts, but women find it difficult to separate their feelings from their speech. This difference can result in women feeling more vulnerable during conflicts.
5.When conflicts arise, hurtful words tend to impact wives much more deeply than husbands, though both may say unkind things. The wife is “utterly destroyed” by harsh words while the husband, though hurt, is typically less affected.
6.The importance of understanding these communication differences is emphasized as crucial for resolving conflicts. Husbands need to recognize that their words carry significant weight and should be careful in their speech, while wives need to understand that men’s more fact-based approach isn’t necessarily uncaring.

Eggerich suggests that recognizing and adapting to these inherent communication differences can help prevent and resolve many marital conflicts. He emphasizes that this understanding should not be used to justify sin or poor behavior, but rather to foster better mutual understanding and more effective communication between spouses.

.

4.How does Eggerich interpret 1 Peter 3:7 in the context of male-female relationships?

Eggerich interprets 1 Peter 3:7 as a key Biblical passage that highlights fundamental differences between men and women, particularly in the context of male-female relationships. His interpretation focuses on several key aspects:

1.Understanding the “weaker vessel”: Eggerich explains that when Peter refers to women as the “weaker vessel,” it’s not speaking of intellectual or physical weakness, but rather emotional vulnerability. He emphasizes that God has created women with a greater emotional sensitivity and capacity for intuition.
2.Husband’s responsibility to understand: The passage is interpreted as an admonition for husbands to be understanding of their wives. Eggerich suggests that men need to think deeply about their wives’ needs and work to perceive them, even though this isn’t always natural or easy for men.
3.Complementary nature of male-female differences: Eggerich sees this verse as supporting the idea that male-female differences are created by God to complement each other. He notes that while these differences can lead to conflict, they’re actually meant to create harmony in marriage.
4.Practical application: Eggerich encourages men to pray for insight into their wives’ needs and to be patient, not harsh or insensitive. He suggests that if husbands simply understood their wives without immediately offering solutions, it would bring great joy to the relationship.
5.Autobiographical element: He speculates that Peter’s instruction might be somewhat autobiographical, suggesting that Peter himself may have struggled with understanding his wife due to his impulsive nature.
6.Balance in responsibilities: While focusing on the husband’s responsibility to understand, Eggerich also notes that the broader passage includes instructions for wives too, maintaining a balance in responsibilities within the relationship.

Overall, Eggerich uses this verse to support his argument that male-female differences are divinely created and should be understood and appreciated rather than ignored or resented in marriage relationships.

.

5.What is the significance of “my response is my responsibility” in the context of gender differences?

In the context of gender differences as discussed in the lesson, the phrase “my response is my responsibility” holds significant importance for understanding and navigating male-female relationships, particularly in marriage. Here’s how it applies:

1.Personal Accountability : The phrase emphasizes that individuals are responsible for their own reactions and emotions, rather than blaming their partner’s actions or inherent differences. Eggerich explains that when irritants or conflicts arise due to male-female differences, it’s crucial to recognize whether the other person is causing your negative reaction or simply revealing pre-existing issues within you. This perspective encourages personal accountability instead of shifting blame.
2.Managing Anger and Irritation : Eggerich uses the example of anger: when someone gets upset with their spouse, they should ask themselves whether their partner caused the anger or merely revealed underlying anger within them. This approach helps individuals manage their emotional responses and prevents escalation of conflicts. It aligns with Biblical principles of responding with grace and patience, akin to Christ’s response to personal attacks.
3.Growth Through Challenges : The concept relates to the illustration of sand in an oyster—irritants can either cause bitterness (like an eye developing blindness) or lead to personal growth and betterment (like an oyster forming a pearl). By taking responsibility for one’s responses to irritations caused by gender differences, individuals can transform potentially negative situations into opportunities for personal development and improved relationships.
4.Acceptance and Change : Understanding that “my response is my responsibility” means accepting aspects of your partner that you cannot change while appropriately addressing areas that need improvement. Eggerich stresses that neither men nor women should use knowledge of gender differences to justify their sins or shortcomings. Instead, they should use this awareness to serve each other better, fostering mutual respect and understanding.
5.Complementarity in Relationships : Recognizing personal responsibility in responses supports the idea that male and female differences are meant to complement each other. When individuals take ownership of their reactions, they can appreciate and leverage these differences to strengthen the relationship rather than allowing them to create friction.

In summary, “my response is my responsibility” serves as a guiding principle for managing conflicts and irritations arising from gender differences. It promotes personal accountability, emotional regulation, growth through challenges, acceptance of differences, and the complementary nature of male-female relationships. This mindset helps couples navigate their unique dynamics with greater understanding and harmony.

.

6.How does the lesson suggest cultural influences have affected perceptions of male-female differences?

The lesson suggests that cultural influences have significantly distorted the perception of male-female differences by promoting the idea that there are no inherent distinctions between the sexes. Eggerich notes a “tremendous advocation” in modern society—especially on college campuses—against acknowledging traditional gender roles or expressing a desire for roles such as wife and mother. He observes that women who voice such aspirations are often met with verbal abuse or criticism. The cultural climate, according to Eggerich, pressures women to become something other than what they were created to be, leading to confusion, unhappiness, and relational dysfunction. He contrasts this cultural narrative with scientific and Biblical evidence, arguing that the differences between men and women are observable even in infancy and are rooted in creation, not social constructs. The lesson warns that abandoning or denying these divinely designed distinctions contributes to personal dissatisfaction and societal dysfunction.

 

7.What Biblical references does the lesson use to support its argument about male-female differences?

The lesson references several Biblical passages to support its argument about male-female differences:

1.1 Peter 3:7 – “Husbands, dwell with them according to knowledge, giving honour unto the wife, as unto the weaker vessel…”
Eggerich uses this verse to emphasize the need for husbands to understand their wives emotionally and relationally, interpreting “weaker vessel” as a reference to emotional sensitivity, not inferiority.
2.Ephesians 5 – Though not quoted directly, the lesson refers to this passage where husbands are commanded to love their wives and wives to respect their husbands. Eggerich highlights the differing emphases (love vs. respect) as indicative of gender-specific needs.
3.Titus 2 – Referenced in relation to women being instructed to love their husbands using the Greek word phileo, which Eggerich notes points to affectionate, friendship-based love, again emphasizing relational orientation.
4.Creation account (Genesis, implied) – The lesson regularly affirms that gender differences are rooted in creation, not culture, aligning with Genesis 1:27 and 2:18–24, though these are not explicitly cited.
5.Christ and the Church (Ephesians 5:22–33, implied) – Eggerich draws a parallel between the relationship of Christ and the Church and that of husband and wife, supporting the concept of different yet complementary roles.

These passages form the theological foundation for Eggerich’s assertion that male and female roles are distinct by divine design, not cultural accident.

.

8.Describe the differing approaches to problem-solving between men and women as outlined in the lesson.

According to the lesson, men and women typically approach problem-solving in fundamentally different ways due to their God-given design:

 Men are described as solution-oriented. When someone presents a problem, a man’s natural tendency is to analyze it and immediately offer advice, reasons, or corrective steps. They aim to fix the issue efficiently and often bypass emotional context. This approach reflects their tendency to think abstractly and prioritize facts and logic.
 Women, by contrast, are described as sympathy-oriented. When someone shares a problem, a woman often focuses less on the problem itself and more on understanding and empathizing with the person experiencing it. Her goal is emotional connection and reassurance rather than immediate resolution. This reflects her people-oriented nature and desire to communicate feelings rather than simply transmit information.

The lesson illustrates this with a common scenario: when a child is upset, they are more likely to go to their mother for comfort and father for solutions. Eggerich uses this example to show that both roles are valuable and that understanding these differences can lead to better relational harmony, especially in marriage.

.

9.What are some communication differences highlighted in the lesson?

The lesson highlights several key communication differences between men and women, emphasizing how these differences often lead to misunderstanding and conflict if not properly recognized. Here are the primary distinctions:

1.Purpose of Communication
 Men: Talk to convey facts, solve problems, or exchange information. For them, conversation is functional and often task-oriented.
 Women: Talk to express and explore feelings. Conversation is relational and emotional, serving as a way to connect, process, and be reassured.
2.Content and Style
 Men: Tend to be idea-oriented and abstract in their speech, often discussing concepts without personal reference.
 Women: Are people-oriented and concrete, often relating conversation to specific people or emotional situations. They personalize discussion and are more likely to ask about others’ experiences and feelings.
3.Emotional Sensitivity to Words
 Women: Take words more personally and can be deeply wounded by unkind remarks, even if unintended. Words and actions are often synonymous for women—what is said carries the same weight as what is done.
 Men: Tend to separate words from actions. They may not understand why a woman is hurt by something they said if no harmful action accompanied it.
4.Conversation Expectations
 A woman may want to “just talk” to connect emotionally, while a man may respond, “What do you want to talk about?”—reflecting his expectation that conversation should have a specific purpose or content.
5.Expression of Love and Connection
 Women often feel most loved when their husbands simply listen and understand them without immediately offering solutions.
 Men, however, may feel puzzled by this, expecting that talking should lead to a clear resolution.

These differences underscore Eggerich’s broader point that misunderstanding each other’s communication styles—without recognizing these natural tendencies—can lead to frustration and emotional distance in relationships.

.

10.How does the lesson propose couples should handle irritations stemming from male-female differences?

The lesson proposes that couples handle irritations stemming from male-female differences by embracing a mindset of understanding, humility, and personal responsibility rather than blame. Eddie Eggerich emphasizes that many of these irritations are not intentional offenses but are simply expressions of natural gender distinctions.

Key approaches include:

1.Recognize Differences as God-Designed
Accept that differences are created by God to complement, not compete. Understanding this can reduce frustration and foster appreciation.
2.Avoid Using Differences to Justify Sin
Eggerich warns against using these insights as excuses for selfish or hurtful behavior. Saying “I’m just a man” or “I’m just a woman” to excuse flaws is discouraged.
3.Adopt the Principle: “My Response Is My Responsibility”
Instead of blaming one’s spouse for triggering anger, Eggerich teaches that the reaction reveals something about the individual’s own heart. The problem often lies not in the other person’s behavior but in one’s own character.
4.Cultivate Christlike Patience and Self-Control
Drawing from Christ’s example, spouses are encouraged to respond to perceived offenses with grace and forbearance, not retaliation or bitterness.
5.Rightly Approach Each Other About Change
Rather than demanding change or manipulating one another, spouses should accept what they cannot change and approach concerns gently and wisely—often, paradoxically, by not trying to change the other directly.

By focusing on understanding rather than judgment and reacting with grace rather than offense, couples can navigate these inherent differences more peacefully and constructively.

.

Review:

1.Eggerich argues that gender differences are rooted in creation by referencing observable behaviors in infants and Scripture, particularly noting that cultural influence cannot account for the drastic distinctions seen shortly after birth.
2.Emotional sensitivity in women, according to Eggerich, includes heightened intuition, a tendency to take words personally, and vulnerability to hurt, especially in emotionally charged or relational situations.
3.Communication is a central theme in Eggerich’s discussion on marital conflict. He notes that women communicate to express feelings, whereas men use conversation to exchange facts, often leading to misunderstandings and emotional disconnect.
4.Eggerich interprets 1 Peter 3:7 as a divine call for husbands to live with their wives in understanding, acknowledging emotional vulnerability and the need for considerate behavior reflective of spiritual equality.
5.The phrase “my response is my responsibility” emphasizes personal accountability in reactions, suggesting that external actions—especially from one’s spouse—do not justify sinful or angry responses.

.


The list of lessons for Friendship, Dating, and Marriage by Eddie Eggerich.

  1. Romance
  2. Why And What Of Dating
  3. Who Of Dating
  4. When And Where Of Dating
  5. How Of Dating 1
  6. How Of Dating 2
  7. Can Be Forgiven For Past Wrongs
  8. Male & Female Differences 1
  9. Male & Female Differences 2 due by 4/27
  10. Male & Female Differences 3

The Best of My Brain