Category Archives: My Church

My Church refers to things related to my spiritual life.

THE ANTIOCH DECLARATION for Dummies Pt 6

The The Antioch Declaration (TAD) struck me like a plow hitting a hard stone buried deep in the soil. There’s something heavy here—something that speaks to why people follow so blindly, like sheep trotting after the shepherd without knowing the path. So, I’m going to try to lay this out simply. My approach is straightforward: I’ll explain each part twice to two imaginary dummies, first for the younger, whose understanding is still growing, and then for the older, who may grasp subtler nuances. My translations aren’t endorsements, but rather attempts to build a bridge of understanding. I’ll pull pieces of the declaration, answer them, and then break them down. This process, like all meaningful conversations, will unfold slowly, over a few days, so that we can stand a little straighter and think a little deeper for ourselves. God help us find clarity. Lord knows, we’ll need His help to do that.

The church stood silent, its walls thick and sturdy, sheltering something no one dared to name. The greatest wrong in our time, tied up in its very soul, wasn’t confronted or even whispered about. Instead, it lay buried deep, safe and shielded by a fortress of endless affirmations and denials, each brick in that wall placed with care. I couldn’t help but wonder how long the silence could hold before the truth burst through.

Here we go.

Schedule


Here is my schedule for getting The Antioch Declaration for Dummies completed. You may also click on the link to jump to that section.

DeclarationDueStatus
Preamble, 1-211/27/24Completed
3-711/29/24Completed
8-1011/30/24Completed
11-1412/04/24Completed
15-1712/06/24Completed
18-1912/12/24Completed
20-2512/13/24in progress
Link to https://antiochdeclaration.com/
Affirmation 18.The Jews

WE DENY that Jews are in any way uniquely malevolent or sinful, that Judaism in its multifarious expressions is objectively more dangerous than other false religions, or that it represents an exceptional threat to Christianity and Christian peoples. By nature, the Jews are objects of wrath just like the rest of us, which is condemnation enough (Psalm 14:2-3), and are equally recipients of God’s grace (Romans 11:11-32).

AgreeDisagreeUncertain Comment:

I can’t agree. To agree would mean denying God, and I won’t do that.  I’ve seen men try to shield others, thinking they’re doing good, but all they’re really doing is pulling a heavy veil over the truth. Like Amaziah, the priest of Bethel, they shut out the warnings and silence anyone who dares to speak sense. (Amos 7:10-17) Amaziah would rather watch his nation crumble to dust than admit it needed to change, and there’s something deeply wrong with that. Evil doesn’t always wear horns or show itself in obvious ways; sometimes, it just whispers lies that keep people on a path to ruin.

Jeremiah 23:14 Also among the prophets of Jerusalem I have seen a horrible thing: The committing of adultery and walking in falsehood; and they strengthen the hands of evildoers, so that no one has turned back from his wickedness. All of them have become to Me like Sodom, and her inhabitants like Gomorrah.

Would Paul Have Signed This?

Paul would not have signed this declaration. His life was marked by conflicts, especially with the Jews, whose opposition left lasting scars. He even wrote to the Thessalonians, urging them to be cautious, his words a mix of wisdom and weariness.

1 Thessalonians 2:14-16 For you, brethren, became imitators of the churches of God in Christ Jesus that are in Judea, for you also endured the same sufferings at the hands of your own countrymen, even as they did from the Jews, who both killed the Lord Jesus and the prophets, and drove us out. They are not pleasing to God, but hostile to all men, hindering us from speaking to the Gentiles so that they may be saved; with the result that they always fill up the measure of their sins. But wrath has come upon them to the utmost.

And to the Romans he wrote…

Romans 11:25-28 For I do not want you, brethren, to be uninformed of this mystery — so that you will not be wise in your own estimation — that a partial hardening has happened to Israel until the fullness of the Gentiles has come in; and so all Israel will be saved; just as it is written, “the Deliverer will come from Zion, He will remove ungodliness from Jacob.” “This is My covenant with them, when I take away their sins.” From the standpoint of the gospel they are enemies for your sake, but from the standpoint of God’s choice they are beloved for the sake of the fathers;

Earlier he had challenged them to be discerning by realizing that not all Israel is Israel.

Romans 9:6-7 But it is not as though the word of God has failed. For they are not all Israel who are descended from Israel; nor are they all children because they are Abraham’s descendants, but: “through Isaac your descendants will be named.”

Church leaders know that calling yourself a Christian doesn’t make it real. But with the Jews, they lose all reason. They stop thinking clearly and push others to do the same. The truth is simple: some people sin more than others. You can’t ignore what’s right in front of your eyes.

Revelation 3:9 ‘Behold, I will cause those of the synagogue of Satan, who say that they are Jews and are not, but lie — I will make them come and bow down at your feet, and make them know that I have loved you.

Paul’s warning was simple, but it carried a weight that couldn’t be ignored: “From the standpoint of the gospel, they are enemies.” Now, how are the Jews enemies? We could trace through the long, winding history of Christianity to find the answer, but that would take more time than we have. Instead, let’s walk the path the Bible has already laid down for us.

Would Luke Have Signed This?

Luke describes many instances of the Jews opposing the truth; we can find the same kind of things going on in the world today.

Acts 14:2 But the Jews who disbelieved stirred up the minds of the Gentiles and embittered them against the brethren.

Acts 13:44-46 The next Sabbath nearly the whole city assembled to hear the word of the Lord. But when the Jews saw the crowds, they were filled with jealousy and began contradicting the things spoken by Paul, and were blaspheming. Paul and Barnabas spoke out boldly and said, “It was necessary that the word of God be spoken to you first; since you repudiate it and judge yourselves unworthy of eternal life, behold, we are turning to the Gentiles.

Luke mentions “the Jews” 56 times in his Gospel and in the Book of Acts. Add to that other references of Pharisees, chief priests, and scribes. The ratio of good Jew to bad Jew would suggest that Luke would never have signed this declaration. They are troublesome. If Luke is a Christian worth imitating, then his emphasis on the Jew is noteworthy. Do we see anything like Luke in our day? Where are such Christian men? How have we come to be so unlike Luke?  

The cause of the problems we have today has a source.

If 2% of our population were Muslim, yet 70% of the positions of power and influence were filled with Muslims, would that be a problem? 2% of our population is Jewish, yet 70% of the positions of power and influence are filled with Jews. That’s a problem. The cause of the problems we have today has a source.

Luke 12:1 Under these circumstances, after so many thousands of people had gathered together that they were stepping on one another, He began saying to His disciples first of all, “Beware of the leaven of the Pharisees, which is hypocrisy.

Pharisees were the leading people of the Jews. They destroyed that nation. They gravitate toward positions of power and once there, mismanage it. Why? Hypocrisy. For example, if the Jew actually sought the welfare of our country, would they be opposed to our desire for them to practice equity and fill only 2% of the positions of power and influence, instead of 70%?  No! It’s equity for us, but not for them.

Would John Have Signed This?

John was an Apostle. He was fully trained by Jesus and wrote about the life of Christ. It is interesting to see what a trained mind considers important. 63 times in 60 verses he mentions “the Jews.” Nearly 3 out of every 5 occurrences put the Jews in negative light. The term is often used to refer to the Jewish religious and political authorities who opposed Jesus rather than the entire population.  John’s focus was to draw out the Jewish elite and call it to our attention. But, we have to study John’s work to understand that, because John is very comfortable with using a broad brush to paint his own people by saying “the Jews.” He doesn’t differentiate between the evil element within the race and the rest. He is not careful like that. He just calls them “the Jews.”

Some of these statements are incredibly insightful. Note the mention of the host country, Rome, in the background. Would John have signed this declaration?

John 11:47-54 Therefore the chief priests and the Pharisees convened a council, and were saying, “What are we doing? For this man is performing many signs. “If we let Him go on like this, all men will believe in Him, and the Romans will come and take away both our place and our nation.” But one of them, Caiaphas, who was high priest that year, said to them, “You know nothing at all, nor do you take into account that it is expedient for you that one man die for the people, and that the whole nation not perish.” Now he did not say this on his own initiative, but being high priest that year, he prophesied that Jesus was going to die for the nation, and not for the nation only, but in order that He might also gather together into one the children of God who are scattered abroad. So from that day on they planned together to kill Him. Therefore, Jesus no longer continued to walk publicly among the Jews, but went away from there to the country near the wilderness, into a city called Ephraim; and there He stayed with the disciples.

Earlier, we read in…

John 7:1 After these things Jesus was walking in Galilee, for He was unwilling to walk in Judea because the Jews were seeking to kill Him.

Yet remember this, Jesus drove the moneychangers out of the Temple not once, but at least twice, and maybe even three times. Why did the Roman guards not intervene? Did they think the Jews deserved it? Why did these Jews keep coming back? What does this say about their character? Do you think they returned after Jesus left?  Where are such people today?

So after Jesus left and went to heaven, He wrote two letters to the Church telling us to be on guard against these Jews. The synagogue of Satan is a pretty serious accusation. Should we ignore His warnings or should we let them inform us?

Revelation 2:9 ‘I know your tribulation and your poverty (but you are rich), and the blasphemy by those who say they are Jews and are not, but are a synagogue of Satan.

Revelation 3:9 ‘Behold, I will cause those of the synagogue of Satan, who say that they are Jews and are not, but lie — I will make them come and bow down at your feet, and make them know that I have loved you.

Would Jesus Have Signed This?

Jesus knew firsthand the trouble the Jew can cause. He did not hesitate to call them out. He sought to spare His followers trouble by pointing them out and warning us to stay vigilant. Jesus would never have signed this declaration. We are not all the same.

Matthew 10:16-18 “Behold, I send you out as sheep in the midst of wolves; so be shrewd as serpents and innocent as doves. “But beware of men, for they will hand you over to the courts and scourge you in their synagogues; and you will even be brought before governors and kings for My sake, as a testimony to them and to the Gentiles.”

Matthew 7:13-16 “Enter through the narrow gate; for the gate is wide and the way is broad that leads to destruction, and there are many who enter through it. For the gate is small and the way is narrow that leads to life, and there are few who find it.

“Beware of the false prophets, who come to you in sheep’s clothing, but inwardly are ravenous wolves. You will know them by their fruits. Grapes are not gathered from thorn bushes nor figs from thistles, are they?”

So, rather than saying that the Jew was like everyone else, Jesus declared, believer beware!  His eternal word says, “notice them, for your own welfare, notice them; for the welfare of your children, notice them; for the welfare of your church, notice them; for the welfare of your state and country, notice them, notice them, notice them.

Are You Going To Sign This?

I am not.

So, let me get back to translating this declaration unless you miss their point.

INTERPRETATION and EXPLANATION

To The Younger

Sometimes people think that Jewish people are more bad or more of a threat than other people, just because they’re Jewish. They might think that the Jewish religion is worse than other religions that aren’t Christian.

But the statement is saying that this is not true. The Bible says that all people are sinful and need God’s help, not just Jewish people. It also says that God loves all people and wants to save them, including Jewish people.

So, Jewish people are not worse or more dangerous than anyone else, just because they’re Jewish. They’re just like everyone else in that they need God’s help and can be saved by Him.

The statement is also saying that we shouldn’t think that the Jewish religion is worse than other religions that aren’t Christian. All religions that aren’t Christian are not telling the whole truth about God, but that doesn’t mean that the Jewish religion is more dangerous or worse than any other non-Christian religion.

So, the main point of the statement is that we should not think that Jewish people or the Jewish religion are uniquely bad or dangerous. We should remember that all people need God’s help and can be saved by Him, no matter what their background is.

To The Older

The authors are saying that Jewish people are not worse or more sinful than anyone else, and that their religion is not more dangerous than other religions that aren’t Christian. The author believes that all people, including Jews, have the chance to be forgiven and loved by God if they follow Jesus. They remind us that we should treat everyone with kindness and respect, no matter what religion they follow.  

Affirmation 19. Conspiracy

WE DENY that world affairs are governed by conspiring Jews or that there is a global Jewish conspiracy to corrupt and destroy Western society.

AgreeDisagreeUncertain Comment:

.

I disagree. These authors may have a zeal for God, but not according to knowledge. Just like false teachers before them, they lead others down a path to destruction.

Hosea 4:6 My people are destroyed for lack of knowledge.

Their denial is over the top, like trying to convince people at noonday that the sun does not shine. I guess they want us to believe that our struggle is in our heads and nothing but our imagination. It is not.

Ephesians 6:12 For our struggle is not against flesh and blood, but against the rulers, against the powers, against the world forces of this darkness, against the spiritual forces of wickedness in the heavenly places.

Just how do the men of The Antioch Declaration understand these forces of wickedness? How do these forces apply their pressure upon us to create our struggle? Are not “rulers” and “world” forces the physical manifestations of spiritual forces? Is it absurd to ask, who are these rulers of this world? Can we not expect an answer?

Knowing the source of wickedness means we include spiritual means in our struggle, not that we should abandon all physical elements of the fight. It does not mean we accept abuse or give up freedom.  That is not a virtue; that is not spiritual. When we look to the future, it also does not mean we pass on to our children a snake instead of bread.  We seek to make a future better for them than for us.

1 Corinthians 7:21-23 Were you called while a slave? Do not worry about it; but if you are able also to become free, rather do that. For he who was called in the Lord while a slave, is the Lord’s freedman; likewise he who was called while free, is Christ’s slave. You were bought with a price; do not become slaves of men.

2 Corinthians 11:19-20 For you, being so wise, tolerate the foolish gladly. For you tolerate it if anyone enslaves you, anyone devours you, anyone takes advantage of you, anyone exalts himself, anyone hits you in the face.

Matthew 7:9-10 “Or what man is there among you who, when his son asks for a loaf, will give him a stone? Or if he asks for a fish, he will not give him a snake, will he?”

Secondly, God believes in conspiracies and He encouraged us to believe in them too. How many times does He remind us to be sober minded, alert, and vigilant? Why did He give us eyes and ears and our other senses to warn us of danger? Why did He say that our adversary is like a lion prowling about seeking someone to devour?

The history of man is the history of men conspiring against one another. Jews are not excluded from this.

Now, if all these cues in Scripture have been of no help, then maybe a review of modern history will wake these men up. Although the subject is complex, it is not impossible to see what world affairs are governed by conspiring Jews. It would be most unusual for a people to not conspire together to seek their own welfare. From Genesis 10 onward that is what we find in the world, men conspiring together to seek their own welfare. For the Jews to stop doing this in our generation as these authors suggest, would be most unusual.

There are many roads that lead to a deeper understanding of “a global Jewish conspiracy to corrupt and destroy Western society.” Once you are convinced that this is possible, then consider these steps to help you brush away the dust that covers up the truth.  

First, surround yourself with loyal supporters whom you can trust implicitly. Consider family members. These individuals will serve as your eyes and ears, providing valuable information and assistance in countering the conspiracy. When we live in a world full of lies, we will eventually fall for some; good friends or good family members can help you and you can help them avoid that.

Next, start gathering evidence to substantiate your claims. How did we get into this mess? Why are we so weak in fighting against evil? What were we taught not to look at, read, watch, etc. Could any of that lead to information that could help us establish civilization once again? Someone showed me this diagram detailing our problems. Is it right or wrong? I don’t know, but most of it makes sense based on what I know. Therefore, I trace it out as much as I can to become resistance to the forces that are driving us to destruction and despair. I eat the fruit and spit out the seeds.

To conclude this introduction to a global Jewish conspiracy to corrupt and destroy Western society watch this video on the concise history of modern Israel – 1948: The Birth of a New Specimen of Human Being. It speaks of the creation of the modern state of Israel. I challenge you to compare it to God’s description of His creation of Israel.

Proverbs 18:17 The first to plead his case seems right, until another comes and examines him.

.

INTERPRETATION and EXPLANATION

To The Older

Sometimes people believe things that aren’t true, like the idea that there’s a secret group of Jewish people who are trying to cause problems and destroy the world. This is called a conspiracy theory.

The statement is saying that this idea is not true. There is no secret group of Jewish people trying to destroy the world or cause problems.

The Bible says that there are bad things in the world because people don’t always do what God wants them to do, but it doesn’t say that any one group of people is responsible for all the bad things.

So, the main point of the statement is that we should not believe in conspiracy theories that say Jewish people are trying to destroy the world. We should remember that all people are capable of doing good and bad things, and that God is the one who is ultimately in control of the world.

To The Younger

The authors are saying that there is no secret group of Jewish people who are trying to control the world or ruin Western society. They believe that this idea is not true and that we shouldn’t blame Jewish people for the problems in the world. The author wants us to remember that all people are equal and should be treated with kindness and respect, no matter what religion they follow.

Schedule


Here is my schedule for getting The Antioch Declaration for Dummies completed. You may also click on the link to jump to that section.

DeclarationDueStatus
Preamble, 1-211/27/24Completed
3-711/29/24Completed
8-1011/30/24Completed
11-1412/04/24Completed
15-1712/06/24Completed
18-1912/12/24Completed
20-2512/13/24in progress
Link to https://antiochdeclaration.com/

Storing Up Wrath They R

They (Israel) mean to tell us they learned nothing from history. They are a god unto themselves. This only makes God angry. They are storing up wrath for themselves in the day of God’s vengeance.

Thus says the Lord, “For three transgressions of Damascus and for four I will not revoke its punishment, because they threshed Gilead with implements of sharp iron. “So I will send fire upon the house of Hazael and it will consume the citadels of Ben-hadad. “I will also break the gate bar of Damascus, and cut off the inhabitant from the valley of Aven, and him who holds the scepter, from Beth-eden; so the people of Aram will go exiled to Kir,” says the Lord.

Amos 1:3-5

08 Believer’s Rewards

Summary

The sermon discusses the concept of rewards for believers as presented in the Bible, particularly focusing on the judgment seat of Christ. It emphasizes that this judgment is not about sin but rather about evaluating the faithfulness and stewardship of believers’ lives. The text outlines various crowns that believers can earn, such as the incorruptible crown and the crown of righteousness, and stresses the importance of building one’s life on a solid foundation of faith. The sermon also highlights the need for self-discipline and accountability in the Christian life, encouraging believers to prioritize their spiritual growth and works in anticipation of receiving rewards in heaven.

Test Your Knowledge

Scrolling down slowly will hide the answer until you can make your choice.

Multiple-Choice Questions

1.What is the primary focus of the judgment seat of Christ?

A) Punishment for sins

B) Evaluation of faithfulness and works

C) Determining salvation

D) Assigning roles in heaven

Answer: B)

.

2.Which of the following is NOT one of the crowns mentioned in the sermon?

A) Crown of righteousness

B) Crown of life

C) Crown of knowledge

D) Crown of glory

Answer: C)

.

3.According to the sermon, what is the foundation upon which believers should build their lives?

A) Their own understanding

B) The teachings of the church

C) Jesus Christ

D) The law of Moses

Answer: C)

.

4.What metaphor is used to describe the evaluation of a believer’s works?

A) A race

B) A garden

C) A fire

D) A building

Answer: C)

.

5.What does the sermon suggest is necessary for a believer to receive a full reward?

A) Wealth and success

B) Self-discipline and prioritization

C) Public recognition

D) Knowledge of Scripture

Answer: B)

.

6.What event immediately precedes the Judgment Seat of Christ?

A) The Great White Throne Judgment

B) The Rapture

C) The Second Coming

D) The Tribulation

Answer: B)

.

7.What does the term “bema” refer to in the context of the sermon?

A) A place of punishment

B) A raised platform for honor

C) A judicial bench

D) A location for prayer

Answer: B)

.

8.According to 2 Corinthians 5:10, what will happen at the Judgment Seat of Christ?

A) Believers will be punished for their sins.

B) Believers will receive rewards based on their deeds.

C) Only non-believers will be judged.

D) All believers will be sent to hell.

Answer: B)

.

9.Which scripture indicates that Jesus will bring rewards with Him?

A) John 3:16

B) Revelation 22:12

C) Matthew 28:19

D) Romans 8:1

Answer: B)

.

10.How does the sermon suggest believers should view their upcoming judgment?

A) With fear and trepidation

B) As a time for celebration and recognition

C) As irrelevant to their faith

D) As a moment of shame

Answer: B)

.

Listen & Read Along

See the full transcript and listen to this sermon here:

1327 Jul 29, 1973.

.

Study Guide

08-Believers-Rewards

In this lesson, the following questions will be addressed:

Outline

I.Introduction to Believer’s Rewards
A.Definition of the judgment seat of Christ
B.Distinction from judgment of sin
II.Types of Rewards
A.Overview of the five crowns
1.Incorruptible crown
2.Crown of righteousness
3.Crown of rejoicing
4.Crown of glory
5.Crown of life
III.Stewardship and Accountability
A.The concept of life as stewardship
B.Importance of self-discipline and priorities
IV.The Evaluation Process
A.Building on the foundation of Christ
B.The testing of works by fire
V.Conclusion
A.Encouragement to live faithfully
B.Anticipation of rewards in heaven

.

Outline 2

I.Introduction
A.Overview of the Judgment Seat of Christ
B.Importance of understanding rewards for believers
II.Scriptural Basis
A.Revelation 22:12
B.2 Timothy 4:7-8
C.2 Corinthians 5:10
III.Timing and Place
A.Occurs immediately after the rapture
B.Location in heaven
IV.Nature of the Judgment
A.Distinction from other judgments (e.g., sin judgments)
B.Focus on works and faithfulness
V.Understanding “Bema”
A.Definition and significance of the term
B.Cultural context from Greek athletics
VI.Conclusion
A.Encouragement for believers regarding anticipation of rewards

.

Study Questions

What are the five crowns mentioned in the sermon, and what does each represent?

The sermon mentions five crowns that believers can earn, each representing different aspects of faithfulness and service in the Christian life:

1.Incorruptible Crown: This crown is awarded to those who have obeyed the Lord’s commands and have made self-sacrifices, demonstrating discipline in their lives to live for God.
2.Crown of Righteousness: This crown is given to all those who love the appearing of Jesus Christ, indicating a life that is dominated by the anticipation of His return.
3.Crown of Rejoicing: Also known as the soul winner’s crown, this is for those who actively share their faith and lead others to Christ.
4.Crown of Glory: This crown is referred to as the shepherd’s crown, awarded to elders and pastor-teachers who faithfully lead and care for their congregations.
5.Crown of Life: This crown is for those who endure persecution and trials, particularly for their faith in Jesus, including those who may be martyred for their beliefs.

Each crown symbolizes a specific reward for the believer’s faithfulness and dedication to God’s work throughout their lives.

.

How does the sermon differentiate between the judgment of sin and the judgment seat of Christ?

The sermon differentiates between the judgment of sin and the judgment seat of Christ by emphasizing their distinct purposes and contexts.

1.Judgment of Sin: This judgment refers to the evaluation of sin that occurred at Calvary, where Jesus Christ bore the sins of humanity. It is a historical event that took place around 30 AD, where God judged sin fully and finally through the death of Jesus. This judgment is about redemption and the consequences of sin, and it is not something that believers will face again.
2.Judgment Seat of Christ: In contrast, the judgment seat of Christ is not about sin but rather about the evaluation of a believer’s life and works after salvation. It focuses on how believers have lived out their faith, their faithfulness, and their stewardship of the gifts and talents given to them by God. This judgment is seen as a time for rewards based on the quality of their works, rather than punishment for sin. The sermon stresses that this judgment is an opportunity for believers to receive praise and rewards from God for their faithfulness, rather than facing condemnation for their sins.

Overall, the judgment of sin deals with the issue of salvation and the consequences of sin, while the judgment seat of Christ is about assessing the believer’s life and rewarding them for their faithfulness and service.

.

In what ways does the concept of stewardship influence a believer’s daily life and decisions?

The concept of stewardship significantly influences a believer’s daily life and decisions in several key ways:

1.Accountability: Believers understand that they are accountable to God for how they manage their lives, resources, and gifts. This awareness encourages them to make choices that align with their faith and values, knowing they will ultimately give an account of their actions.
2.Purposeful Living: Stewardship instills a sense of purpose in a believer’s life. They are motivated to live intentionally, using their time, talents, and treasures to serve God and others. This can lead to involvement in ministry, charitable work, and community service, as believers seek to fulfill their responsibilities as stewards.
3.Resource Management: The concept of stewardship encourages believers to manage their resources wisely. This includes financial stewardship, where they are called to be responsible with their finances, practice generosity, and support the work of the church and missions. It also extends to managing their time and energy effectively, prioritizing activities that honor God.
4.Moral and Ethical Decision-Making: Stewardship influences how believers approach moral and ethical dilemmas. They are guided by biblical principles and the desire to honor God in their decisions, leading them to consider the impact of their choices on themselves, others, and their relationship with God.
5.Spiritual Growth: Engaging in stewardship fosters spiritual growth as believers seek to develop their gifts and talents for God’s glory. This can involve participating in church activities, studying Scripture, and engaging in prayer, all of which contribute to their spiritual maturity and understanding of their role as stewards.

Overall, the concept of stewardship shapes a believer’s worldview, guiding their actions and decisions in a way that reflects their commitment to God and their desire to live a life that is pleasing to Him.

.

Why is self-discipline emphasized as crucial for Christians in their pursuit of rewards?

Self-discipline is emphasized as crucial for Christians in their pursuit of rewards for several reasons:

1.Focus on Priorities: Self-discipline helps Christians prioritize their spiritual growth and responsibilities. By maintaining focus on what truly matters—such as their relationship with God, service to others, and living out their faith—they can avoid distractions that lead to a life filled with worthless activities.
2.Building a Strong Foundation: The sermon highlights that Christians are called to build their lives on the foundation of Christ using valuable materials (gold, silver, precious stones) rather than worthless ones (wood, hay, stubble). Self-discipline is necessary to ensure that they are making choices that contribute to a strong spiritual foundation, which will withstand the test at the judgment seat of Christ.
3.Preparation for Rewards: The pursuit of rewards in heaven requires intentional effort and discipline in daily life. Christians are encouraged to run the race of faith with purpose, which involves training themselves spiritually, much like an athlete prepares for competition. This preparation includes studying Scripture, prayer, and engaging in acts of service.
4.Overcoming Temptations: Self-discipline equips Christians to resist temptations and sinful behaviors that can lead to a loss of rewards. By exercising self-control, they can make choices that align with their faith and avoid actions that would be deemed worthless at the judgment seat.
5.Demonstrating Faithfulness: Self-discipline is a reflection of a believer’s commitment to being a good steward of the gifts and responsibilities entrusted to them by God. It shows that they are serious about their faith and are actively working to fulfill their calling, which is essential for receiving praise and rewards from God.

In summary, self-discipline is crucial for Christians as it enables them to live purposefully, build a strong spiritual foundation, prepare for eternal rewards, resist temptations, and demonstrate faithfulness in their stewardship of life.

.

How does the testing of works by fire serve as a metaphor for evaluating a believer’s life?

The testing of works by fire serves as a powerful metaphor for evaluating a believer’s life in several significant ways:

1.Purification Process: Just as fire is used to refine metals, removing impurities and revealing the true quality of the material, the metaphor illustrates how God will evaluate the works of believers to determine their value. This process signifies that only those actions and deeds that are genuine and of eternal significance will endure, while those that are superficial or self-serving will be burned away.
2.Revealing True Intentions: The fire metaphor emphasizes that the true nature of a believer’s works will be revealed. It signifies that God will not only assess the actions themselves but also the motives behind those actions. Works done with pure intentions and for God’s glory will withstand the test, while those done out of selfishness or legalism will not.
3.Eternal Value: The testing by fire highlights the distinction between works that have eternal value (gold, silver, precious stones) and those that are worthless (wood, hay, stubble). This serves as a reminder to believers to focus on activities that contribute to their spiritual growth and the advancement of God’s kingdom, rather than engaging in pursuits that lack lasting significance.
4.Accountability: The metaphor underscores the concept of accountability in a believer’s life. It reinforces the idea that every believer will stand before the judgment seat of Christ to give an account of their life and works. This accountability encourages believers to live with intention and purpose, knowing that their actions will be evaluated.
5.Encouragement for Faithfulness: The imagery of testing by fire serves as both a warning and an encouragement. It warns believers to be mindful of how they live and the quality of their works, while also encouraging them to strive for faithfulness in their service to God. The promise of rewards for those whose works endure serves as motivation for believers to invest in their spiritual lives.

In summary, the testing of works by fire metaphorically represents the evaluation of a believer’s life by God, focusing on the purity, intentions, eternal value, accountability, and the encouragement to live faithfully in accordance with God’s will.

.

What is the significance of the Judgment Seat of Christ in relation to believers’ works?

The Judgment Seat of Christ is significant for believers as it represents a time of reward based on their works during their earthly lives, rather than a punitive judgment for sins. This event occurs immediately after the rapture, as indicated in Revelation 22:12, where Jesus states that He will bring rewards to give to each person according to their deeds. The Apostle Paul emphasizes this concept in 2 Corinthians 5:10, noting that all believers will appear before this judgment seat to receive what they have done, whether good or bad.

The term “bema,” which refers to a raised platform, underscores the nature of this judgment as one of honor and recognition. Unlike other judgments in scripture that focus on sin, the Judgment Seat of Christ is primarily about acknowledging faithful service and rewarding believers for their efforts in advancing God’s kingdom. This understanding encourages believers to live purposefully and faithfully, knowing that their actions will be recognized and rewarded by Christ.

Key Points

1.Timing: The Judgment Seat of Christ occurs immediately after the rapture.
2.Nature of Judgment: It is not a judgment for sin but a reward for works.
3.Scriptural Basis: References include Revelation 22:12 and 2 Corinthians 5:10.
4.Concept of “Bema”: The term signifies a platform of honor rather than a place of condemnation.
5.Encouragement for Believers: This event motivates believers to serve faithfully, anticipating recognition from Christ.

This perspective fosters hope and anticipation among Christians, reinforcing the idea that all believers will ultimately receive praise from God for their faithfulness and service.

How does the concept of “bema” alter the understanding of judgment for Christians?

The concept of “bema” significantly alters the understanding of judgment for Christians by shifting the focus from a traditional view of judgment as punitive to one that emphasizes honor and reward. In the context of the Judgment Seat of Christ, the term “bema,” which literally means a raised platform, is used to signify a place where believers will be recognized for their works rather than judged for their sins. This understanding is rooted in the cultural context of ancient Greek athletic competitions, where winners were celebrated on a bema, receiving crowns or garlands as symbols of their achievements. Therefore, the Judgment Seat is not about condemning believers for wrongdoing; instead, it represents an opportunity for believers to receive praise and rewards from Christ based on their faithfulness and service during their earthly lives. This perspective encourages Christians to anticipate this event positively, as it is characterized by recognition rather than fear.

Key Points

1.Bema Defined: The term “bema” refers to a raised platform associated with honor and dignity, contrasting with punitive connotations commonly associated with judgment.
2.Cultural Context: The concept draws from Greek athletic traditions where victors were celebrated on a bema, reinforcing the idea of reward rather than condemnation.
3.Focus on Rewards: The Judgment Seat of Christ is primarily about rewarding believers for their faithful service, as emphasized in scriptures like 2 Corinthians 5:10.
4.Encouragement for Believers: Understanding “bema” fosters a positive anticipation for believers regarding their works and recognition in heaven.

This redefinition of judgment helps alleviate fears surrounding the Judgment Seat, promoting an understanding that all believers will ultimately receive praise from God, making it a hopeful and encouraging aspect of Christian faith.

In what ways does the sermon differentiate between various judgments mentioned in scripture?

The sermon differentiates between various judgments mentioned in scripture by categorizing them based on their timing, purpose, and context. Here are the key distinctions made:

1.Judgment of Sin: This judgment occurred historically at Calvary around 30 AD, where Jesus bore the sins of humanity. It is a one-time event that signifies God’s final judgment on sin through Christ’s sacrifice.
2.Judgment of Self: This ongoing judgment takes place during the believer’s life on earth. It involves self-evaluation and repentance to avoid divine discipline. The believer is responsible for judging their own actions to maintain spiritual integrity.
3.Judgment of Believers’ Works: This judgment occurs after the rapture and is specifically for believers. It evaluates their works to determine rewards in heaven, rather than punishment for sin. The focus is on recognizing faithful service.
4.Judgment of Israel: This judgment pertains to Israel and will occur at the end of the tribulation period when Christ returns to judge the nation, separating the faithful from the rebels.
5.Judgment of Gentiles: Also known as the judgment of nations, this occurs at the end of the tribulation when Christ separates believing Gentiles from unbelievers.
6.Judgment of Satan and Demons: This judgment is reserved for Satan and his fallen angels and will take place at the end of the millennial kingdom.
7.Great White Throne Judgment: This judgment is for all unsaved individuals throughout history and occurs after the millennial reign of Christ, where they are judged based on their deeds and ultimately cast into the lake of fire.

The sermon emphasizes that each judgment has a specific time and place, highlighting that they should not be conflated with one another. The Judgment Seat of Christ (bema) is particularly noted for being a place of honor rather than condemnation, focusing on rewarding believers for their faithful works rather than judging them for sin. This distinction serves to provide clarity on the nature of God’s judgments and reassures believers about their standing in Christ.

Why is it important for believers to anticipate their rewards at the Judgment Seat of Christ?

Anticipating rewards at the Judgment Seat of Christ is essential for believers for several reasons:

1.Motivation for Faithful Service: Understanding that there will be a time of reward encourages believers to live out their faith actively and serve God wholeheartedly. The anticipation of receiving rewards based on their works can inspire Christians to engage in acts of love, service, and obedience to God’s commands, knowing that their efforts will be recognized.
2.Clarification of Judgment Nature: The Judgment Seat of Christ is not a punitive judgment for sins but a rewarding experience. This distinction alleviates fears associated with traditional notions of judgment, allowing believers to approach the event with hope and excitement rather than anxiety. As highlighted in the sermon, the term “bema” signifies a place of honor where believers will receive recognition for their faithful service.
3.Encouragement from Scripture: Scriptures such as Revelation 22:12 and 2 Timothy 4:7-8 affirm that Jesus will bring rewards for believers based on their deeds. This scriptural assurance reinforces the importance of living a life aligned with God’s purpose, as it emphasizes that every action has eternal significance.
4.Expectation of Praise: The anticipation of receiving praise from God is a powerful motivator. The sermon mentions that every believer will have praise from God at this judgment, reinforcing the idea that all Christians can look forward to being honored for their faithfulness, which fosters a sense of belonging and purpose within the body of Christ.
5.Hope for Eternal Perspective: Anticipating rewards at the Judgment Seat helps believers maintain an eternal perspective. It encourages them to focus on spiritual growth and the impact of their lives on others, knowing that their earthly actions contribute to their eternal standing in heaven.

In summary, anticipating rewards at the Judgment Seat of Christ is crucial as it motivates believers to serve faithfully, clarifies the nature of judgment as one of honor rather than condemnation, and provides hope and encouragement through scriptural promises. This anticipation ultimately shapes how believers live out their faith in anticipation of eternal rewards.

How do the referenced scriptures support the idea that this judgment is not about punishment?

The referenced scriptures support the idea that the Judgment Seat of Christ is not about punishment by emphasizing themes of reward, recognition, and the nature of believers’ standing before God. Here are key points from the scriptures that highlight this perspective:

1.2 Corinthians 5:10: This verse states, “For we must all appear before the judgment seat of Christ, so that each one may receive what is due for what he has done in the body, whether good or evil.” The focus here is on receiving what is due for one’s actions, suggesting a system of rewards rather than punishment. The emphasis on “what is due” implies that believers will be rewarded for their good works rather than judged for their sins.
2.Revelation 22:12: In this verse, Jesus declares, “Behold, I am coming soon, bringing my recompense with me, to repay each one for what he has done.” The term “recompense” indicates a rewarding action, reinforcing the idea that believers will receive rewards based on their deeds. This further illustrates that the judgment is about recognizing and rewarding faithful service rather than punishing wrongdoing.
3.1 Corinthians 3:12-15: This passage discusses how each person’s work will be tested by fire to reveal its quality. It states that if someone’s work survives, they will receive a reward; if it is burned up, they will suffer loss but still be saved. The notion that believers may experience loss but are ultimately saved underscores that this judgment does not lead to condemnation but rather serves as an evaluation of their works.
4.Romans 8:1: Although not directly addressing the Judgment Seat of Christ, this verse affirms that “there is therefore now no condemnation for those who are in Christ Jesus.” This foundational truth reassures believers that they are not subject to punishment for their sins because Christ has already paid the penalty.
5.2 Timothy 4:7-8: Paul expresses confidence in receiving a “crown of righteousness” from the Lord at His appearing. This promise of a crown indicates a reward for faithful service and reinforces the idea that the judgment focuses on commendation rather than condemnation.

These scriptures collectively emphasize that the Judgment Seat of Christ is characterized by reward and recognition for believers’ faithful service rather than punishment for sin. They provide a clear theological foundation that encourages believers to live righteously in anticipation of receiving rewards from God.

To see all the lessons in this series click on the 1973 Prophecy tag below.

THE ANTIOCH DECLARATION for dummies Pt 5

The The Antioch Declaration (TAD) struck me like a plow hitting a hard stone buried deep in the soil. There’s something heavy here—something that speaks to why people follow so blindly, like sheep trotting after the shepherd without knowing the path. So, I’m going to try to lay this out simply. My approach is straightforward: I’ll explain each part twice to two imaginary dummies, first for the younger, whose understanding is still growing, and then for the older, who may grasp subtler nuances. My translations aren’t endorsements, but rather attempts to build a bridge of understanding. I’ll pull pieces of the declaration, answer them, and then break them down. This process, like all meaningful conversations, will unfold slowly, over a few days, so that we can stand a little straighter and think a little deeper for ourselves. God help us find clarity. Lord knows, we’ll need His help to do that.

The church stood silent, its walls thick and sturdy, sheltering something no one dared to name. The greatest wrong in our time, tied up in its very soul, wasn’t confronted or even whispered about. Instead, it lay buried deep, safe and shielded by a fortress of endless affirmations and denials, each brick in that wall placed with care. I couldn’t help but wonder how long the silence could hold before the truth burst through.

Here we go.

Schedule


Here is my schedule for getting The Antioch Declaration for Dummies completed. You may also click on the link to jump to that section.

DeclarationDueStatus
Preamble, 1-211/27/24Completed
3-711/29/24Completed
8-1011/30/24Completed
11-1412/04/24Completed
15-1712/06/24Completed
18-1912/12/24Completed
20-2512/13/24in progress
Link to https://antiochdeclaration.com/
Affirmation 15. Scapegoats

WE AFFIRM that in deeply unsettled times there is a carnal desire in fallen man to seek out a scapegoat for sin and social corruption. This sadistic urge seeks to expiate guilt by laying the blame and punishment for all cultural ills on an identifiable group(s). The victimized group(s) is offered up to the masses as providing ostensible ‘explanatory power’ for cultural decay, which all conspiracy theories must provide if they are to gain any traction. The Jews have often been the easiest target for this kind of sinful and decrepit thinking.

AgreeDisagreeUncertain Comment:

Although I agree that blaming others for one’s own faults is sinful, the authors introduce a race (the Jews) that they think “have often been the easiest target for this kind of sinful and decrepit thinking.” With that I disagree.

Why was it, I wonder, that God chose the days of the Roman Republic to send the Savior? Why not when Israel was a sovereign kingdom, standing alone in its independence?  The choice feels significant, as though history itself was shaping the stage for something far greater than anyone could have imagined.

A comparison of the two kingdoms is revealing, but beyond the scope of this post. The Old Testament itself shows a pattern of behavior regarding this people that might answer this question sufficiently.

Exodus 32:9 The Lord said to Moses, “I have seen this people, and behold, they are an obstinate people.

Deuteronomy 9:13 “The Lord spoke further to me, saying, ‘I have seen this people, and indeed, it is a stubborn people.

It wasn’t just God who noticed. Moses noticed it too. Without a doubt, he saw the path they were on.

Deuteronomy 31:27 “For I [Moses] know your rebellion and your stubbornness; behold, while I am still alive with you today, you have been rebellious against the Lord; how much more, then, after my death?

Fast forward many years later. Had they changed?  No. Here is God’s description of them then.

Ezekiel 2:4 “I am sending you to them who are stubborn and obstinate children, and you shall say to them, ‘Thus says the Lord God.’

Fast forward again, to the time of the New Testament. Read Stephen’s speech in Acts 7 which portrays the Israelites as stubborn, disobedient, resistant to God’s messengers, and guilty of rejecting and killing the Messiah.

Remember, it was at this time that Jesus had to forcefully remove the moneychangers from the Temple, not once but two or three times! Where do you think they went after He left?

Read Acts; who antagonized the church the most, the host country (White Europeans) or the Jews?  Jesus and Paul could travel freely around the Roman Republic, but at home, who was the constant threat?

John 7:1 After these things Jesus was walking in Galilee, for He was unwilling to walk in Judea because the Jews were seeking to kill Him.

Study the Gospel of John; 3 out of every 5 occurrences of the term “the Jews” is negative. John knew what they were like and did not fail to bring that to light.

Now, all of this does not mean that every single Jew on the planet was out to kill Jesus, but it DOES MEAN that “the Jews” were stubborn, disobedient, resistant to God’s messengers, and guilty of rejecting and killing the Messiah. As a group, as a nation, particularly the leaders of that nation, they were problematic. Are we supposed to ignore what God put in our Bible to pay attention too?

Why did God have to command His people how to live in foreign lands?

Jeremiah 29:7-8 ‘Seek the welfare of the city where I have sent you into exile, and pray to the Lord on its behalf; for in its welfare you will have welfare.’ “For thus says the Lord of hosts, the God of Israel, ‘Do not let your prophets who are in your midst and your diviners deceive you, and do not listen to the dreams which they dream.

Does Jeremiah call attention to the character of this people?

Jeremiah 13:23 “Can the Ethiopian change his skin or the leopard his spots? Then you also can do good who are accustomed to doing evil.

The pattern of “the Jews” explains why God waited until the Roman Republic. He waited until government matured and was in the hands of those that could wield it skillfully. The White man can be proud of his heritage and accomplishments. God recognized them. The White man should also remember that to whom much is given, much will be required. A review of history would reveal that for the most part, but not in every part, the White man understood that.

Do you remember in Genesis 4 the three descendants of Cain? Three families with different gifts that form a degree of interdependence in the progress of civilization.

Genesis 4:19-22 Lamech took to himself two wives: the name of the one was Adah, and the name of the other, Zillah. Adah gave birth to Jabal; he was the father of those who dwell in tents and have livestock. His brother’s name was Jubal; he was the father of all those who play the lyre and pipe. As for Zillah, she also gave birth to Tubal-cain, the forger of all implements of bronze and iron; and the sister of Tubal-cain was Naamah.

What gift does your family bring to the table?

We are not all equal. Like a basketball team composed of people of different heights, there are different positions for each player. To have the center play guard because we are all equal would destroy the strength of the team. There is only one race that encourages this value. The Jews, more than any other, want us to believe everyone is equal.

Rep. Thomas Abernathy read this passage into the Congressional Record on June 7, 1957 (Vol. 103, p. 8559, top of page.)

So, what is it that I don’t agree with in this declaration? I disagree with the idea that it’s a sin to see what’s wrong in a people and say it. The Jews do evil, and it deserves to be called out. That’s all there is to it. How can one bless Israel, if they do not call Israel to repentance? How can one call Israel to repentance without reference what Israel does? It is wrong to say it is wrong to speak against Israel. (see Amos 7:14-17).

Now, here is my translation of this declaration.

.

INTERPRETATION and EXPLANATION

To The Younger

Sometimes when things are going wrong in the world or in a society, people want to find someone to blame. They look for a group of people who they can say are causing all the problems, even if it’s not true. This is called finding a “scapegoat.”

The statement is saying that this is a bad thing to do, and it’s something that people who don’t follow God often do. They want to make themselves feel better by blaming someone else for everything that’s going wrong.

One group of people who have often been blamed for things they didn’t do is the Jews. People have said that the Jews are the reason for all sorts of problems, even though it’s not true.

The statement is saying that this is a bad and wrong thing to do. We shouldn’t blame innocent people for problems that they didn’t cause, just because we want someone to blame.

Instead, we should look at what the Bible says and try to do what’s right, even when things are difficult or scary. We should remember that God is in control and that He wants us to love and care for others, not to blame them for things they didn’t do.

To The Older

The authors are saying that when people are worried or upset about problems in society, they sometimes look for someone to blame. They might choose a group of people, like the Jews, and say that they are the reason for all the bad things happening. The author believes that this is a wrong and hurtful way to think, and that instead, we should look to Jesus and His teachings for guidance on how to fix problems in the world.

Affirmation 16. Scapegoating

WE DENY that scapegoating is a legitimate practice for Christians to participate in because God has already provided the final and perfect scapegoat in Christ Jesus who alone is the true sin-bearer.

AgreeDisagreeUncertain Comment:

.

I agree. If it is wrong for Christians, then is it wrong for everyone else? Non-Whites need to understand that God has provided the final and perfect scapegoat, and they don’t need to blame Whites. But, who will tell them?  

.

Here is my translation of this declaration.

INTERPRETATION and EXPLANATION

To The Younger

In the Bible, there’s a story about a special animal called a “scapegoat.” The scapegoat was used to take away the sins of the people by having all the sins put on it and then sending it away into the wilderness.

The statement is saying that Christians should not try to find other people to blame for their problems or the problems of society, because Jesus is the perfect scapegoat. He took away all the sins of the world by dying on the cross.

So, instead of blaming other people for things that go wrong, Christians should remember that Jesus has already taken care of the problem of sin. They should trust in Him and try to do what’s right, even when things are difficult.

In other words, Christians should not act like people who don’t believe in God and try to find someone else to blame for their problems. They should remember that Jesus is the answer to the problem of sin, and they should follow Him and do what He says.

To The Older

The authors are saying that people who follow Jesus shouldn’t blame other people or groups for their problems or mistakes. Instead, they should remember that Jesus took all the blame and punishment for sin when He died on the cross. The author believes that following Jesus means treating others with love and kindness, not blaming them for things that aren’t their fault.

Affirmation 17. Antisemitism

WE DENY that our rejection of antisemitism requires us to ignore or minimize the destructive impact that various God-hating individual Jews have had in human history, just as our rejection of the hatred of Europeans and Anglo-Saxons does not require us to ignore the cultural devastation that many God-hating individual Gentiles have produced. Every ethnic people have members to be ashamed of, and every ethnic people have members to be grateful for.

AgreeDisagreeUncertain Comment:

.

I agree.

It’s striking how God sent Isaiah to speak to the hearts of individuals, yet He did it by addressing the whole ethnic group. The vision Isaiah saw wasn’t just about one person—it was about a city, a nation, a shared life. Isaiah’s words cut through Judah and Jerusalem like a plow turning over dry earth, exposing what lay beneath.

Isaiah 1:1 The vision of Isaiah the son of Amoz concerning Judah and Jerusalem, which he saw during the reigns of Uzziah, Jotham, Ahaz and Hezekiah, kings of Judah.

It’s like a basketball coach yelling at the team after a loss—every player feels the sting because they’re part of the whole. If we don’t understand this, we miss how evil works quietly, spreading like weeds until it’s choking us all. We must not shy away from speaking to any ethnic group for fear of being called racist. Let God be our example here and confront evil wherever it is found and at whatever level it is found.  We must not stand with the Amaziahs of the world, but oppose them.  

Amos 7:16 Now hear the word of the Lord: you [Amaziah, the priest of Bethel] are saying, ‘You shall not prophesy against Israel nor shall you speak against the house of Isaac.’

When they tell us to be silent, we must climb to the top of the house and shout!

Matthew 10:26-27 Therefore do not fear them, for there is nothing concealed that will not be revealed, or hidden that will not be known. What I tell you in the darkness, speak in the light; and what you hear whispered in your ear, proclaim upon the housetops.

INTERPRETATION and EXPLANATION

To The Younger

Sometimes people don’t like other people because of their race or where they come from. This is called hatred, and it’s not a good thing. The Bible says that we should love and respect everyone, no matter what race they are or where they come from.

The statement is saying that even though we should not hate Jewish people or any other group of people, that doesn’t mean we have to pretend that everyone from that group is perfect. There have been some Jewish people in history who have done bad things, just like there have been people from other groups who have done bad things.

So, we can still talk about the bad things that some people have done, even if they’re part of a group that we shouldn’t hate. We don’t have to ignore or pretend like those bad things didn’t happen.

At the same time, we can also talk about the good things that people from every group have done. Every group of people has some members who have done things to be proud of and grateful for.

So, the statement is saying that we can reject hatred and still be honest about history. We can talk about the bad things that some people have done without hating their whole group, and we can also talk about the good things that people from every group have done.

To The Older

The authors are saying that even though we shouldn’t hate or blame entire groups of people, like Jews or Europeans, we can still recognize that some individuals from these groups have done bad things in history. The author believes that we should judge people by their actions and choices, not by what group they belong to. They also remind us that every group has both good and bad people, and we should be grateful for the good ones.

Schedule


Here is my schedule for getting The Antioch Declaration for Dummies completed. You may also click on the link to jump to that section.

DeclarationDueStatus
Preamble, 1-211/27/24Completed
3-711/29/24Completed
8-1011/30/24Completed
11-1412/04/24Completed
15-1712/06/24Completed
18-1912/12/24Completed
20-2512/13/24in progress
Link to https://antiochdeclaration.com/

THE ANTIOCH DECLARATION for dummies Pt 4

The The Antioch Declaration (TAD) struck me like a plow hitting a hard stone buried deep in the soil. There’s something heavy here—something that speaks to why people follow so blindly, like sheep trotting after the shepherd without knowing the path. So, I’m going to try to lay this out simply. My approach is straightforward: I’ll explain each part twice to two imaginary dummies, first for the younger, whose understanding is still growing, and then for the older, who may grasp subtler nuances. My translations aren’t endorsements, but rather attempts to build a bridge of understanding. I’ll pull pieces of the declaration, answer them, and then break them down. This process, like all meaningful conversations, will unfold slowly, over a few days, so that we can stand a little straighter and think a little deeper for ourselves. God help us find clarity. Lord knows, we’ll need His help to do that.

The church stood silent, its walls thick and sturdy, sheltering something no one dared to name. The greatest wrong in our time, tied up in its very soul, wasn’t confronted or even whispered about. Instead, it lay buried deep, safe and shielded by a fortress of endless affirmations and denials, each brick in that wall placed with care. I couldn’t help but wonder how long the silence could hold before the truth burst through.

Here we go.

Schedule


Here is my schedule for getting The Antioch Declaration for Dummies completed. You may also click on the link to jump to that section.

DeclarationDueStatus
Preamble, 1-211/27/24Completed
3-711/29/24Completed
8-1011/30/24Completed
11-1412/04/24Completed
15-1712/06/24Completed
18-1912/12/24Completed
20-2512/13/24in progress
Link to https://antiochdeclaration.com/
Affirmation 11. Repentance

WE AFFIRM that there is a vital biblical difference between the self-loathing of men in the grip of disillusionment over a failed idol, and the true repentance of the Christian man.

Agree   ☐ Disagree   ☐ Uncertain    Comment:

I agree.

INTERPRETATION and EXPLANATION

To The Younger

Sometimes people believe in things that aren’t true or good, like believing that they’re not important or that they’re bad people. This can make them feel really sad and upset with themselves, like they hate who they are. This feeling is called “self-loathing.”

But the Bible talks about a different way to feel bad about yourself. It’s called “repentance,” and it’s when you realize that you’ve done something wrong or sinned, and you want to change and ask God for forgiveness.

The statement is saying that there’s a big difference between feeling really bad about yourself because you believed in something that wasn’t true (self-loathing) and feeling bad about yourself because you know you’ve done something wrong and you want to change (repentance).

Self-loathing is like being sad because you believed in a fake god or idol that let you down. But repentance is like being sad because you know you’ve done something to disobey the real God, and you want to make it right.

So, the statement is saying that it’s important to know the difference between feeling bad about yourself because you believed in the wrong thing and feeling bad about yourself because you know you’ve sinned and want to change.

To The Older

The authors are saying that there is a big difference between feeling really bad about yourself because you believed in something that turned out to be wrong (self-loathing), and truly being sorry for your mistakes and asking God for forgiveness (repentance). The author believes that only through repentance and following Jesus can people find true happiness and peace.

Affirmation 12.Fathers

WE DENY that it is possible to recover an ethic that honors our fathers and their momentous sacrifices while actively and openly dishonoring them.

Agree   ☐ Disagree   ☐ Uncertain    Comment:

I agree. Every generation has the challenge of showing respect for their fathers’ bravery and sacrifice along with protecting the truth about the reasons and causes of their battle, so that future generations may walk in righteousness and truth. Until the reasons and the causes of any life altering war are understood, recovering an ethic is always going to be difficult. This delicate balance is expressed in Scripture.

Ezekiel 18

Then the word of the Lord came to me, saying, “What do you mean by using this proverb concerning the land of Israel, saying, ‘The fathers eat the sour grapes, But the children’s teeth are set on edge’?

“As I live,” declares the Lord God, “you are surely not going to use this proverb in Israel anymore. “Behold, all souls are Mine; the soul of the father as well as the soul of the son is Mine. The soul who sins will die.

“But if a man is righteous and practices justice and righteousness, and does not eat at the mountain shrines or lift up his eyes to the idols of the house of Israel, or defile his neighbor’s wife or approach a woman during her menstrual period — if a man does not oppress anyone, but restores to the debtor his pledge, does not commit robbery, but gives his bread to the hungry and covers the naked with clothing, if he does not lend money on interest or take increase, if he keeps his hand from iniquity and executes true justice between man and man, if he walks in My statutes and My ordinances so as to deal faithfully — he is righteous and will surely live,” declares the Lord God.

“Then he may have a violent son who sheds blood and who does any of these things to a brother (though he himself did not do any of these things), that is, he even eats at the mountain shrines, and defiles his neighbor’s wife, oppresses the poor and needy, commits robbery, does not restore a pledge, but lifts up his eyes to the idols and commits abomination, he lends money on interest and takes increase; will he live? He will not live! He has committed all these abominations, he will surely be put to death; his blood will be on his own head.

“Now behold, he has a son who has observed all his father’s sins which he committed, and observing does not do likewise. “He does not eat at the mountain shrines or lift up his eyes to the idols of the house of Israel, or defile his neighbor’s wife, or oppress anyone, or retain a pledge, or commit robbery, but he gives his bread to the hungry and covers the naked with clothing, he keeps his hand from the poor, does not take interest or increase, but executes My ordinances, and walks in My statutes; he will not die for his father’s iniquity, he will surely live. “As for his father, because he practiced extortion, robbed his brother and did what was not good among his people, behold, he will die for his iniquity.

“Yet you say, ‘Why should the son not bear the punishment for the father’s iniquity?’ When the son has practiced justice and righteousness and has observed all My statutes and done them, he shall surely live. “The person who sins will die. The son will not bear the punishment for the father’s iniquity, nor will the father bear the punishment for the son’s iniquity; the righteousness of the righteous will be upon himself, and the wickedness of the wicked will be upon himself.

“But if the wicked man turns from all his sins which he has committed and observes all My statutes and practices justice and righteousness, he shall surely live; he shall not die. “All his transgressions which he has committed will not be remembered against him; because of his righteousness which he has practiced, he will live. “Do I have any pleasure in the death of the wicked,” declares the Lord God, “rather than that he should turn from his ways and live?

“But when a righteous man turns away from his righteousness, commits iniquity and does according to all the abominations that a wicked man does, will he live? All his righteous deeds which he has done will not be remembered for his treachery which he has committed and his sin which he has committed; for them he will die. “Yet you say, ‘The way of the Lord is not right.’ Hear now, O house of Israel! Is My way not right? Is it not your ways that are not right? “When a righteous man turns away from his righteousness, commits iniquity and dies because of it, for his iniquity which he has committed he will die. “Again, when a wicked man turns away from his wickedness which he has committed and practices justice and righteousness, he will save his life. “Because he considered and turned away from all his transgressions which he had committed, he shall surely live; he shall not die. “But the house of Israel says, ‘The way of the Lord is not right.’ Are My ways not right, O house of Israel? Is it not your ways that are not right?

“Therefore I will judge you, O house of Israel, each according to his conduct,” declares the Lord God. “Repent and turn away from all your transgressions, so that iniquity may not become a stumbling block to you. “Cast away from you all your transgressions which you have committed and make yourselves a new heart and a new spirit! For why will you die, O house of Israel? “For I have no pleasure in the death of anyone who dies,” declares the Lord God. “Therefore, repent and live.”

This proverb is about the children’s teeth set on edge and shows that the actions of one generation has an impact on the next. The main point is that each person is responsible for their own choices and actions.  This means that we do need to pay attention to what we do today, not because the next generation will hold us accountable, but because God will hold us accountable for our own choices and actions.  At the same time, it’s important for us to learn from the mistakes of previous generations and to try to do better. We can honor our fathers and mothers by building on the good things they did and by trying to avoid the mistakes they made.  So, while we are each responsible for our own actions, we can also show love and respect for others, both those who came before us and those who will come after us, by learning from the past and striving to do what is right in the present.

Another important truth to consider on this is…

Proverbs 13:22 A good man leaves an inheritance to his children’s children…

This proverb is talking about the importance of being wise and responsible with the things God has given us, and of using them to bless others, especially our families. But what happens when a father does not act in a wise and responsible way, but instead squanders his wealth and leads his children into hardship? In such a case, it can be very difficult for the children to honor their father, especially if they feel that he has acted selfishly and harmed them in the process.

In the Bible, there are many examples of fathers who made mistakes or did wrong things, and their children had to deal with the consequences. One example is David, who was a great king but also made some serious mistakes that affected his children and his kingdom.  In these cases, it’s important for children to remember that their first loyalty is to God, and that they are called to follow Him even if their parents did not. They can still show respect for their parents by not speaking badly about them and by trying to learn from their mistakes, but they don’t have to agree with everything their parents did or follow in their footsteps.  It’s also important for children to remember that they are not defined by their parents’ actions or mistakes. They can choose to follow God and live a life of wisdom and righteousness, even if their parents did not.

So, while it can be difficult to know how to honor a parent who has made serious mistakes or acted selfishly, the most important thing is to follow God and to seek to live a life that is pleasing to Him. We never want to be in a position where, if asked, we answer in the affirmative on a question like Jesus asked these people:

Or what man is there among you who, when his son asks for a loaf, will give him a stone? Or if he asks for a fish, he will not give him a snake, will he? Matthew 7:9-10

The welfare of our children must be foremost.

So yes on this declaration, I agree, but would add, beware, it is not as simple as simply saying,

WE DENY that it is possible to recover an ethic that honors our fathers and their momentous sacrifices while actively and openly dishonoring them.

Here is how I translated that.

INTERPRETATION and EXPLANATION

To The Younger

This statement is about how we should treat those who came before us, like our parents, grandparents, and the people who made sacrifices for us in history. It’s saying that we can’t truly honor them and what they’ve done if, at the same time, we are openly disrespecting or dishonoring them. These two things don’t go together—they cancel each other out.

The Bible teaches us to “honor your father and your mother” (Exodus 20:12). This commandment isn’t just about how we treat our parents; it’s also about showing respect and gratitude to those who came before us. Honoring them means recognizing their sacrifices, learning from their lives, and being thankful for what they’ve given us. It doesn’t mean we have to agree with everything they did, but it does mean we should approach their legacy with humility and respect.

If we disrespect or criticize them unfairly, especially in a way that shows no gratitude for their sacrifices, then we’re not really living out an ethic of honor. For example, if we enjoy the freedoms and blessings that they worked hard to secure but speak badly about them without understanding their struggles or context, that’s dishonoring.

As Christians, we’re called to balance truth and grace. We can acknowledge the imperfections of those who came before us, but we should do so in a way that still shows gratitude and respect. This is part of loving our neighbor and living out God’s command to honor others.

To The Older

The authors are saying that we can’t truly show respect and gratitude for the brave things our ancestors did, like fighting in wars, if we also say and do things that make them look bad. The author believes that we should always try to honor and remember the good things our ancestors did, even if they weren’t perfect.

Affirmation 13. False Leaders

WE AFFIRM that as the secular liberal edifice crumbles, many will refuse to turn to Christ. As the “strong gods” inevitably return, godless influential figures will arise the same way Theudas did (Acts 5:34-39).[i] The temptation for some Christian leaders will be to ape such methods for the sake of clicks, followers and the ephemeral notion of ‘influence.’

[i] Act 5:36: Theudas was a Jewish magician, revolutionary and false Messiah, who gathered followers to the river Jordan, promising to part it. The Roman governor Fadus sent troops who killed and captured members of the crowd; Theudas was himself captured and eventually beheaded.

Agree   ☐ Disagree   ☐ Uncertain    Comment:

I agree and affirm this declaration. The church has a job: to guard its leaders and make sure they follow Christ.  In 2 Peter 2, there’s a warning: leaders must follow Christ, only Christ. Yet now, the modern church bends to the weight of Zionism, a faith not its own. It’s as though leaders barter their loyalty for a false peace, afraid to speak against Israel lest they lose their power. These men are more like Amaziah, clinging to comfort in Amos’ time, than like Christ, who carried the burden of truth on His back.

Amos 7:10-17 Then Amaziah, the priest of Bethel, sent word to Jeroboam king of Israel, saying, “Amos has conspired against you in the midst of the house of Israel; the land is unable to endure all his words. “For thus Amos says, ‘Jeroboam will die by the sword and Israel will certainly go from its land into exile.'” Then Amaziah said to Amos, “Go, you seer, flee away to the land of Judah and there eat bread and there do your prophesying! “But no longer prophesy at Bethel, for it is a sanctuary of the king and a royal residence.”

Then Amos replied to Amaziah, “I am not a prophet, nor am I the son of a prophet; for I am a herdsman and a grower of sycamore figs. “But the Lord took me from following the flock and the Lord said to me, ‘Go prophesy to My people Israel.’ “Now hear the word of the Lord: you are saying, ‘You shall not prophesy against Israel nor shall you speak against the house of Isaac.’ “Therefore, thus says the Lord, ‘Your wife will become a harlot in the city, your sons and your daughters will fall by the sword, your land will be parceled up by a measuring line and you yourself will die upon unclean soil. Moreover, Israel will certainly go from its land into exile.'”

The authors appended a footnote, and it’s quite revealing.  They mention how Fadus, a Roman governor, sent soldiers to track down and kill what we might call, “rebellious men, empty talkers and deceivers who upset whole families, teaching things they should not teach for the sake of sordid gain.” (Titus 1:10-11). These men weren’t leading with truth; they were exploiting people for profit.  But consider this paradox: it was not the church, guardian of truth, that rose to action, but a pagan Roman governor.  Think about that—a man of no faith acting while the church did nothing!  The men who wrote this declaration seem blind to this point of fact.

So, a Roman governor, serving his people and answering to the Senate, worked to keep order in the province. His task was to enforce Roman laws, protect against threats from within and without, and keep rebellion at bay. The result of his efforts wasn’t hostility toward Christianity—far from it. By wielding the authority given to him by his people, he created a safe and stable home for everyone under his rule. Roads became secure for travelers, including Christians spreading their message. Quiet towns and cities gave people space to hear and reflect on the Gospel. The Roman world, governed by its own strict ideals, provided exactly what Paul encouraged the church to pray for: a government that maintained peace and order.

1 Timothy 2:1-4 First of all, then, I urge that entreaties and prayers, petitions and thanksgivings, be made on behalf of all men, for kings and all who are in authority, so that we may lead a tranquil and quiet life in all godliness and dignity. This is good and acceptable in the sight of God our Savior, who desires all men to be saved and to come to the knowledge of the truth.

Church and State are two separate, but interdependent entities created by God for our good. Fadus understood that truth better than almost every American “Christian” today, including Pastors.

Such things are rarely noted, but they are in the Bible. Consider the line in the sand that Luke points to when describing another incident involving a Roman governor, the proconsul of Achaia.

Acts 18:14-16 But when Paul was about to open his mouth, Gallio said to the Jews, “If it were a matter of wrong or of vicious crime, O Jews, it would be reasonable for me to put up with you; but if there are questions about words and names and your own law, look after it yourselves; I am unwilling to be a judge of these matters.” And he drove them away from the judgment seat.

The point Luke makes here is that the natural man, by way of his reason, not revelation from God, sees the line dividing church and state. It’s clear and sharp. He doesn’t question it. His will desires to follow along. A born-again experience is not required. The secular mind knows the line is there, and that’s enough.

Christian pastors are tasked with watching over the souls of their congregation. A governor is tasked with watching over the soul of the nation. They each have separate tool sets to do their jobs; they each run in separate lanes. Back when God took a mob of slaves and began to form them into a nation, He assigned only one tribe to conduct the work needed upon the soul of man. The other 11 were given the task of foraging for food and protecting the family. That ratio, 11:1, is probably a divine and natural balance when it comes to having a healthy nation. I think one would be wise to expect that most of the help they would like to have to secure the blessings of liberty to themselves and their posterity will come from outside the church, not inside the church.

Consider the interplay between church and state this way: Consider the church as the sun and clouds up above. They cast their warmth and shade upon all that lies down below. Down below is the earth and sea; here is where men practice their stewardship over the earth. Here is where we see the power of the state play out – on earth and sea. The sun and clouds up above, they will be felt, but they will not, could not, and should not control.

Consider further Genesis 4 where Cain murdered Abel. There was yet to be any government on the earth at that time. Yet see how God played the part of government here. He resisted evil when evil appeared. He confronted Cain to persuade him to do otherwise; He did not go so far as to control him though. Then, after the crime, when judgment was needed, God bent His own law of capital punishment to fit the context of the situation. God’s law was not an end unto itself; it served a higher purpose which was the need to fill the earth with mankind. (If you have seen the movie End of the Spear then you know how revenge can spiral out of control to exterminate a race of people.) God, with His superior wisdom, averted this by implementing a civil law that protected a murderer, a law that lasted at least 600 years as it was later recalled by Lamech verbatim. By then we see Cain’s great grandchildren contributing back to society in positive ways, compensating for the one that had upended it. If justice had been served, that would not be. Such is the marvelous role of government (see Romans 13:1-10). We should not get too religious about it. We should not overlook its place either as the authors of this declaration and many others have done.

I have said enough; here is my…

INTERPRETATION and EXPLANATION

To The Older

The authors are saying that as the ideas of separating religion from public life start to fall apart, some people will not turn to Jesus for help. Instead, they might follow other leaders who don’t believe in God and use tricks to get people to listen to them. The author warns that some Christian leaders might be tempted to act like these false leaders to get more attention and followers, but they shouldn’t do this.

To The Younger

Sometimes people believe in things that aren’t true or good, like not believing in God or following the wrong ideas. When these things start to fall apart, some people might not want to believe in Jesus and follow what the Bible says.

Instead, they might start to believe in other things or follow other leaders who don’t believe in God either. This is like what happened in the Bible when a man named Theudas tried to get people to follow him instead of following God.

The statement is saying that when this happens, some Christian leaders might be tempted to act like these other leaders who don’t believe in God. They might try to get people to follow them by using the same methods, like trying to get lots of attention or followers on social media.

But this would be the wrong thing to do. Christian leaders should always try to follow Jesus and what the Bible says, even if it’s not the popular or easy thing to do. They shouldn’t try to act like leaders who don’t believe in God just to get more attention or followers.

So, the statement is saying that it’s important for Christian leaders to stay true to their beliefs and to follow Jesus, even when it might be tempting to act like other leaders who don’t believe in God.

Affirmation 14.Pastors

WE DENY that it is possible to be a faithful Christian shepherd without identifying, naming and fighting the wolves which prey on the flock. As such, pastors have a duty to confront and rebuke wickedness in all its forms within their congregations.

Agree   ☐ Disagree   ☐ Uncertain    Comment:

I agree.

Ephesians 5:6-13 Let no one deceive you with empty words, for because of these things the wrath of God comes upon the sons of disobedience. Therefore do not be partakers with them; for you were formerly darkness, but now you are Light in the Lord; walk as children of Light (for the fruit of the Light consists in all goodness and righteousness and truth), trying to learn what is pleasing to the Lord. Do not participate in the unfruitful deeds of darkness, but instead even expose them; for it is disgraceful even to speak of the things which are done by them in secret. But all things become visible when they are exposed by the light, for everything that becomes visible is light.

The pastor should lead and teach his congregation how to do this. The church should be the pillar and support of the truth, not just for the church, but for the family, the state, and the world.

1 Timothy 3:15 …I write so that you will know how one ought to conduct himself in the household of God, which is the church of the living God, the pillar and support of the truth.

Attack On Mankind

If a man or a people seek to convince you that a man can become a woman, the shepherd should lead the way to expose this lie. The Church may not have the tools to stop it, but it does have the tools to expose it, or if not, it should find them. Fadus, the governor will stop it. (See the previous affirmation for my comments on Fadus.)

Genesis 1:28 God created man in His own image, in the image of God He created him; male and female He created them.

Remember this video from my previous post? What do you remember about it?

Attack On Family

If a man or a people seek to convince you that a man can marry a man, the shepherd should lead the way to expose this lie. It may not have the tools to stop it, but it does have the tools to expose it, or if not, it should find them. Fadus, the governor will stop it.

Genesis 2:24 For this reason a man shall leave his father and his mother, and be joined to his wife; and they shall become one flesh.

There are people acting like pillars regarding this truth; these people committed to God’s design for mankind should be supported and their information disseminated. For a fitting example regarding this topic see The Ministry of Minority-Worship: Gay Rights and Goals of Globohomo, specifically the extensive quote starting at “Frank Kameny – “our Rosa Parks.”

Attack On Nation

If a man or a people seek to convince you that a nation is multiculturalism, then the shepherd should lead the way to expose this lie. The church may not have the tools to stop it, but it does have the tools to expose it, and if not, it should find them. Fadus will stop it.

God has been clear on this:

Genesis 10:5 From these the coastlands of the nations were separated into their lands, every one according to his language, according to their families, into their nations.

Genesis 10:20 These are the sons of Ham, according to their families, according to their languages, by their lands, by their nations.

Genesis 10:31-32 These are the sons of Shem, according to their families, according to their languages, by their lands, according to their nations. These are the families of the sons of Noah, according to their genealogies, by their nations; and out of these the nations were separated on the earth after the flood.

So everyone ignored all that (like we do today as everyone follows the Nimrods of our day) and then…

Gen 11:8 So the Lord scattered them abroad from there over the face of the whole earth; and they stopped building the city.

Now we are right back to marching our way eastward to the plains of Shinar. Who is resisting this? All the early Christians reverenced these sacred truths:

1 Cor 10:6 Now these things happened as examples for us, so that we would not crave evil things as they also craved.

1 Cor 10:11 Now these things happened to them as an example, and they were written for our instruction, upon whom the ends of the ages have come.

Rom 15:4 For whatever was written in earlier times was written for our instruction, so that through perseverance and the encouragement of the Scriptures we might have hope.

The church must be the pillar and support of the truth, not just for the church, but for all these institutions created by God for our good.

“If I profess with the loudest voice and clearest exposition every portion of the truth of God except precisely that little point which the world and the devil are at that moment attacking, I am not confessing Christ, however boldly I may be professing Christ. “Wherever the battle rages, there the loyalty of the soldier is proved and to be steady on all the battlefield besides is mere flight and disgrace if he flinches at that one point.”

I support this declaration.

INTERPRETATION and EXPLANATION

To The Younger

In the Bible, Jesus sometimes talks about His followers as being like sheep in a flock, and He calls Himself the Good Shepherd. He says that there are also bad people out there who are like wolves, who want to hurt and trick the sheep.

The statement is saying that pastors, who are like the shepherds of the flock, have a very important job to do. They need to be able to see when there are “wolves” among the sheep – people who are doing bad things or trying to trick others – and they need to do something about it.

This means that pastors have to be brave and speak up when they see something wrong happening in their church. They have to tell people when they’re doing something that’s against what the Bible says, and they have to try to stop the bad things from happening.

So, the statement is saying that it’s very important for pastors to be able to see and fight against the bad things that might be happening in their church, just like a shepherd has to protect his sheep from wolves.

To The Older

The authors are saying that Christian leaders, like pastors, have a responsibility to protect the people they lead from bad things and people who might try to hurt them. This means that pastors should always speak out against anything that goes against what Jesus taught, and make sure that their followers are safe and following God’s rules.

Schedule


Here is my schedule for getting The Antioch Declaration for Dummies completed. You may also click on the link to jump to that section.

DeclarationDueStatus
Preamble, 1-211/27/24Completed
3-711/29/24Completed
8-1011/30/24Completed
11-1412/04/24Completed
15-1712/06/24Completed
18-1912/12/24Completed
20-2512/13/24in progress
Link to https://antiochdeclaration.com/

3 Friendship, Dating, And Marriage

Who Of Dating

Summary

The article discusses the principles of dating from a Christian perspective, emphasizing the importance of selecting a partner who exemplifies the fruit of the Holy Spirit. It encourages individuals to consider various factors such as cultural and socioeconomic backgrounds, shared interests, and the fulfillment of biblical roles in relationships. The author addresses common objections to dating only Christians, advocating for the idea that true fulfillment comes from a relationship with Christ rather than from another person. The article also highlights the significance of being the right person while seeking a partner and the necessity of engaging in Christian community activities to meet potential mates.

Here is a list of questions this lesson will answer:

Study Guide

Outline:

I.Introduction
A.Importance of dating principles
B.Christian perspective on relationships
II.Key Considerations in Partner Selection
A.Biblical roles and ministry effectiveness
B.Cultural and socioeconomic backgrounds
C.Shared interests and hobbies
III.Common Objections to Dating Only Christians
A.Evangelism through dating
B.Socializing with non-Christians
C.The role of divine guidance in relationships
IV.The Importance of Personal Development
A.Being the right person
B.Recognizing that no one can fulfill all needs
V.Conclusion
A.The role of the Christian community in mate selection
B.Final thoughts on dating and relationships

Outline 2

I.Introduction
A.Definition of romance and its significance
B.Distinction between romantic love and infatuation
II.Understanding Dating
C.Purpose of dating: establishing compatibility
D.Importance of emotional, mental, social, and spiritual compatibility
III.Evaluating Relationships
A.Role of group activities, discussions, and evaluations by friends and family
B.Compatibility assessment through personality tests
IV.Biblical Teachings on Relationships
A.Definitions of fornication and sensuality
B.Importance of adhering to biblical standards regarding premarital sex
V.Objectives for Dating
A.Guidelines for selecting partners
B.Emphasis on being the right person versus finding the right person
VI.Objections to Dating Guidelines
A.Common objections from Christians regarding dating non-Christians
B.Addressing misconceptions about dating dynamics
VII.Conclusion
A.Summary of key points
B.Encouragement for thoughtful dating practices

.

Multiple-Choice Questions:

1.What is the primary focus of the article?
a.The history of dating
b.Principles of dating from a Christian perspective
c.The psychology of love
d.The impact of technology on relationships

Answer: b

.

2.According to the article, what should individuals look for in a potential partner?
a.Wealth and status
b.Shared cultural background
c.Exemplification of the fruit of the Holy Spirit
d.Physical attractiveness

Answer: c

.

3.What is one objection to dating only Christians mentioned in the article?
a.Christians are not fun
b.Non-Christians can be good partners
c.Who will evangelize if Christians don’t date non-Christians?
d.Dating is not important

Answer: c

.

4.What does the article suggest is essential for personal fulfillment in relationships?
a.Finding the perfect partner
b.Having a strong social life
c.A relationship with Christ
d.Financial stability

Answer: c

.

5.How does the article recommend individuals should engage with their Christian community?
a.By avoiding social events
b.By participating in youth activities and mission projects
c.By focusing solely on personal growth
d.By dating only within the community

Answer: b

.

6.What is one primary purpose of dating mentioned in the article?
a.To have fun
b.To establish compatibility for marriage
c.To find a temporary partner
d.To avoid loneliness

Answer: b

.

7.According to the article, what should individuals focus on while dating?
a.Finding the right person
b.Being the right person
c.Impressing others
d.Following trends

Answer: b

.

8.What does the term “fornication” refer to in the context of this article?
a.Emotional infidelity
b.Sexual intercourse prior to marriage
c.Casual dating
d.Long-term relationships

Answer: b

.

9.How many times does research suggest people may fall in love before realizing it was infatuation?
a.1-2 times
b.3-4 times
c.5-8 times
d.10-12 times

Answer: c

.

10.Which aspect is NOT mentioned as a way to evaluate compatibility?
a.Group activities
b.Personality tests
c.Financial status
d.Family evaluations

Answer: c

.

Study Questions:

1.What are the biblical roles mentioned in the article, and how do they influence partner selection?

The article emphasizes the importance of understanding biblical roles in the context of dating and partner selection. The key biblical roles mentioned include:

1.Role of the Husband: The husband is often seen as the leader and provider in the relationship, responsible for loving and respecting his wife. This role is grounded in Ephesians 5:25, which instructs husbands to love their wives as Christ loved the church.
2.Role of the Wife: The wife is encouraged to respect and support her husband, as highlighted in Ephesians 5:33. The article references Titus 2:5, which suggests that a wife should love her husband and be a friend to him.

These biblical roles influence partner selection by guiding individuals to seek partners who share similar values and understandings of these roles. When both partners have a clear understanding of their biblical responsibilities, it fosters compatibility and a stronger foundation for a relationship. The article suggests that recognizing and discussing these roles can help individuals determine if they are aligned in their expectations and commitments, ultimately leading to a more fulfilling and godly relationship.

.

2.How does the author suggest individuals should approach the objections to dating non-Christians?

The author suggests that individuals should approach the objections to dating non-Christians with a thoughtful and biblical perspective. Here are the key points regarding how to address these objections:

1.Evangelism Focus: The author argues that dating should not be viewed as a primary means of evangelism. Instead, Christians are encouraged to evangelize within their own circles, suggesting that it is more appropriate for Christians to engage in outreach with fellow believers rather than seeking romantic relationships with non-Christians.
2.Compatibility Concerns: The author highlights that relationships with non-Christians often lead to a lack of compatibility, particularly in spiritual matters. This can create significant challenges in a relationship, as differing beliefs can lead to conflicts and misunderstandings.
3.Biblical Instruction: The article references 2 Corinthians 6:14, which instructs Christians not to be unequally yoked with non-believers. The author emphasizes that this biblical directive is crucial for maintaining a harmonious and spiritually aligned relationship.
4.Personal Fulfillment: The author points out that pursuing a relationship with a non-Christian may lead to regret and dissatisfaction, as the spiritual needs of a believer may not be met by a non-believer. The focus should be on finding a partner who shares a commitment to Christ, which is essential for a fulfilling relationship.
5.Community Support: The author encourages individuals to engage with their Christian community, which can provide support and opportunities to meet potential partners who share their faith. This communal approach can help alleviate the pressure of finding a partner outside of the Christian faith.

Overall, the author advocates for a careful consideration of the implications of dating non-Christians, urging individuals to prioritize their spiritual well-being and the biblical principles that guide relationships.

.

3.In what ways does the article emphasize the importance of personal development in the context of dating?

The article emphasizes the importance of personal development in the context of dating in several key ways:

1.Being the Right Person: The author stresses that before seeking a partner, individuals should focus on becoming the right person themselves. This involves cultivating a strong relationship with Christ, developing character, and embodying the qualities that one would desire in a partner. Personal growth is seen as foundational to forming healthy relationships.
2.Spiritual Maturity: The article highlights the necessity of spiritual maturity in dating. A strong spiritual foundation allows individuals to navigate relationships with wisdom and discernment. The author suggests that a deep love for Christ and a commitment to living out biblical principles are essential for making wise choices in dating.
3.Self-Reflection: The author encourages individuals to engage in self-reflection to understand their own needs, desires, and motivations. This self-awareness helps individuals recognize what they truly seek in a partner and ensures that they are not entering a relationship out of loneliness or desperation.
4.Avoiding Compromise: The article warns against compromising on biblical principles due to emotional needs or societal pressures. Personal development involves understanding one’s worth and not settling for less than what aligns with one’s values and beliefs.
5.Engagement in Community: The author advocates for involvement in Christian community activities, which not only fosters personal growth but also provides opportunities to meet like-minded individuals. Engaging with others who share similar faith commitments can enhance personal development and create a supportive environment for dating.
6.Long-Term Perspective: The article encourages individuals to adopt a long-term perspective on relationships, emphasizing that personal development is an ongoing process. By focusing on growth and maturity, individuals can build a solid foundation for future relationships, rather than rushing into dating without adequate preparation.

Overall, the article underscores that personal development is crucial for establishing healthy, fulfilling relationships that honor God and align with biblical teachings.

.

4.What role does the Christian community play in helping individuals find suitable partners?

The Christian community plays a significant role in helping individuals find suitable partners in several ways:

1.Support and Guidance: The community provides emotional and spiritual support, offering guidance on dating and relationships based on biblical principles. This support can help individuals navigate the complexities of dating with wisdom and discernment.
2.Opportunities for Fellowship: The article emphasizes the importance of engaging in activities and events within the Christian community, such as church gatherings, youth groups, and service projects. These settings create opportunities for individuals to meet and interact with potential partners who share their faith and values.
3.Shared Values and Beliefs: Being part of a Christian community ensures that individuals are surrounded by others who have similar convictions about faith, morality, and the roles of husband and wife. This shared foundation can lead to more compatible relationships, as partners are likely to have aligned goals and expectations.
4.Accountability: The Christian community can provide accountability in dating relationships. Friends and mentors within the community can offer insights and feedback, helping individuals to stay true to their values and avoid compromising their beliefs.
5.Encouragement to Grow: The community encourages personal and spiritual growth, which is essential for healthy relationships. Engaging with others who are committed to their faith can inspire individuals to develop their character and deepen their relationship with Christ, making them more prepared for a partnership.
6.Structured Opportunities for Meeting: The article mentions that churches and Christian organizations can create structured opportunities for singles to meet, such as retreats, social events, and group activities. These environments facilitate connections in a safe and supportive context.
7.Mentorship and Role Models: The presence of mature Christian couples within the community can serve as role models for younger individuals. Observing healthy, godly relationships can provide valuable lessons and insights into what a Christ-centered partnership looks like.

In summary, the Christian community serves as a vital resource for individuals seeking suitable partners by providing support, opportunities for fellowship, shared values, accountability, encouragement for personal growth, structured meeting opportunities, and mentorship. This communal aspect helps individuals to find partners who align with their faith and life goals, ultimately fostering healthier and more fulfilling relationships.

.

5.How does the article differentiate between romantic love and the fulfillment that comes from a relationship with Christ?

The article differentiates between romantic love and the fulfillment that comes from a relationship with Christ in several key ways:

1.Source of Fulfillment: The author emphasizes that true fulfillment ultimately comes from a relationship with Christ and the indwelling of the Holy Spirit, rather than from romantic relationships. While romantic love can bring joy and companionship, it cannot provide the deep, lasting fulfillment that comes from a personal relationship with God.
2.Limitations of Romantic Love: The article points out that romantic love, while significant, is inherently limited. It can lead to emotional highs and lows, and individuals may find that their expectations for fulfillment from a partner can lead to disappointment. The author warns that relying on another person to meet all emotional and spiritual needs is unrealistic, as all individuals are flawed and sinful.
3.Joy and Peace from Christ: The fulfillment that comes from Christ is described as a source of joy, peace, and stability that transcends the ups and downs of romantic relationships. The author notes that the fruit of the Holy Spirit—such as love, joy, and peace—provides a deeper sense of contentment that cannot be replicated by human relationships.
4.Expectation Management: The article encourages individuals to manage their expectations in romantic relationships. It highlights that while a partner can contribute to happiness, they cannot fulfill all needs. Understanding this distinction helps individuals approach relationships with a healthier mindset, recognizing that their ultimate fulfillment should come from their relationship with Christ.
5.Spiritual Growth: The author suggests that a strong relationship with Christ fosters personal growth, which can enhance romantic relationships. When individuals are grounded in their faith, they are better equipped to love and support their partners, leading to healthier dynamics. This spiritual foundation is essential for navigating the challenges that arise in romantic love.
6.Temporary vs. Eternal: The article contrasts the temporary nature of romantic love with the eternal nature of the fulfillment found in Christ. Romantic relationships may change or end, but the relationship with Christ offers a constant source of hope and fulfillment that endures beyond earthly relationships.

In summary, the article underscores that while romantic love can be meaningful and enjoyable, it is not a substitute for the deep, abiding fulfillment that comes from a relationship with Christ. This distinction encourages individuals to seek their ultimate satisfaction in their faith, which can positively influence their romantic relationships.

.

.

6.What are the key differences between romantic love and infatuation as discussed in the article?

The key differences between romantic love and infatuation, as discussed in the article, center on emotional depth and long-term viability. Romantic love is characterized by a deep, genuine connection that includes emotional, mental, social, and spiritual compatibility. It often develops over time and involves a mutual understanding and commitment between partners. In contrast, infatuation is typically marked by intense but superficial feelings that can lead to an overwhelming sense of attraction without a solid foundation for a lasting relationship. The article notes that individuals often mistake infatuation for love during the experience, believing they are in love when they are actually experiencing a fleeting passion. Research indicates that people may fall in love multiple times before recognizing these feelings as infatuation rather than true love, emphasizing the importance of distinguishing between the two to avoid potential heartache in dating relationships.

.

7.How does the author suggest individuals assess their compatibility with potential partners?

The author suggests that individuals assess their compatibility with potential partners through several key methods:

1. Group Activities: Engaging in group activities rather than isolated dates allows individuals to observe how they and their potential partner interact in a social setting, which can reveal compatibility in personality and interests.

2. Extensive Discussions: Open and honest conversations about values, beliefs, and life goals help partners understand each other’s perspectives and emotional compatibility.

3. Conflict Resolution: Observing how both individuals handle conflicts can provide insight into their emotional maturity and compatibility in stressful situations.

4. Family Evaluations: The author emphasizes the importance of family input, suggesting that family members often have a vested interest in the individual’s happiness and can offer valuable perspectives on the relationship.

5. Friends’ Evaluations: Friends can provide insights based on their understanding of the individual’s personality and habits, helping to identify any potential red flags in the relationship.

6. Personality Tests: Utilizing personality assessments can help partners understand their compatibility on a deeper psychological level.

These methods collectively aim to establish whether individuals are compatible emotionally, mentally, socially, and spiritually, which is crucial for determining the potential for a lasting relationship.

.

8.What biblical principles regarding premarital relationships are highlighted in the article?

The article highlights several biblical principles regarding premarital relationships, emphasizing the importance of adhering to scriptural teachings. Key points include:

1. Fornication: The article defines fornication as engaging in sexual intercourse prior to marriage, which is explicitly labeled as sin in the Bible. It underscores that sexual relations are only appropriate within the confines of marriage, where God approves of the union.

2. Lasciviousness/Sensuality: The author discusses the concept of lasciviousness, which involves inciting lust or engaging in behaviors that provoke sexual desire without actual intercourse. Such actions are also considered sinful and can lead to spiritual consequences.

3. Grieving the Holy Spirit: Engaging in premarital sex or sensual behaviors can grieve the Holy Spirit, resulting in a loss of spiritual fellowship and joy. The article stresses that Christians should not justify their behavior based on feelings of love, as this does not align with biblical standards.

4. Self-Justification: The author warns against self-justification, where individuals rationalize their actions contrary to biblical teachings. This mindset can lead to spiritual complacency and a disconnect from God’s standards.

5. Importance of Commitment: The article emphasizes that individuals should date with the intention of establishing compatibility for marriage, focusing on being the right person rather than merely finding the right partner. This commitment aligns with biblical teachings about relationships and marriage.

Overall, the article advocates for a dating approach that respects biblical principles, prioritizing spiritual alignment and personal integrity over societal norms or temporary feelings.

.

9.Why does the author emphasize the role of family and friends in evaluating relationships?

The author emphasizes the role of family and friends in evaluating relationships for several important reasons:

1. Objective Perspective: Family and friends can provide an outside perspective that may be more objective than the individuals involved in the relationship. Their insights can help identify potential red flags or compatibility issues that the couple might overlook due to emotional involvement.

2. Understanding of Values: Family members and close friends often share similar values and beliefs, particularly in a Christian context. Their evaluations can help ensure that the relationship aligns with these shared values, which is crucial for long-term compatibility.

3. Support System: Involving family and friends in the evaluation process fosters a supportive environment. Their approval and support can contribute positively to the relationship, while their concerns can serve as important warnings.

4. Experience and Wisdom: Older family members and friends may have more life experience and wisdom regarding relationships. They can offer valuable advice based on their own experiences, helping younger individuals navigate potential challenges.

5. Accountability: Family and friends can provide accountability, encouraging individuals to adhere to their values and avoid behaviors that may lead to spiritual or emotional harm. This accountability is particularly significant in maintaining biblical standards regarding dating and relationships.

By highlighting these roles, the author underscores the importance of a communal approach to dating, where the input of trusted loved ones contributes to making informed and spiritually aligned decisions about relationships.

.

10.What are some common objections Christians have about dating non-Christians, according to the article?

According to the article, common objections that Christians have about dating non-Christians include:

1. Biblical Commandments: Many Christians reference biblical teachings that advise against being unequally yoked, which means forming close relationships with those who do not share the same faith. This principle is often cited as a foundational reason for avoiding dating non-Christians.

2. Spiritual Differences: There is a concern that differing beliefs can lead to significant spiritual conflicts and challenges in the relationship. Christians worry that a non-Christian partner may not understand or support their faith, potentially leading to friction in shared values and life goals.

3. Influence on Faith: Christians fear that dating a non-Christian could negatively influence their own faith and spiritual practices. The concern is that being in a relationship with someone who does not share their beliefs may weaken their commitment to their faith and lead them away from Christian teachings.

4. Family and Community Expectations: There is often pressure from family and church communities to date within the faith. Christians may feel obligated to adhere to these expectations to maintain harmony within their social and familial circles.

5. Long-term Relationship Viability: Many Christians believe that relationships between believers and non-believers are less likely to succeed in the long term due to fundamental differences in life priorities, values, and moral frameworks.

These objections reflect a broader concern about maintaining spiritual integrity and aligning one’s romantic relationships with their faith commitments.


To see all the lessons for Friendship, Dating, and Marriage click here.

  1. Romance
  2. Why And What Of Dating
  3. Who Of Dating
  4. When And Where Of Dating due by 12/8
  5. How Of Dating

07 Will The Church Go Through The Tribulation 3

Is prophecy important? What is going to happen to you because you did not recognize what time it was?

Luke 19:44 and they will level you to the ground and your children within you, and they will not leave in you one stone upon another, BECAUSE YOU DID NOT RECOGNIZE THE TIME of your visitation.”

I hope this message helps you understand what time it is.

Summary

The sermon “Will the Church Go Through the Tribulation?, Part 3” discusses the theological question of whether the church will experience the tribulation, a period of divine judgment prophesied in the Bible. The speaker argues that the church will not go through the tribulation based on three main points: the nature of the church, the nature of the tribulation, and the nature of Christ’s second coming. The sermon references biblical passages, particularly from 2 Peter and Zephaniah, to illustrate God’s historical judgments against sin and to emphasize that the tribulation is specifically for Israel as a consequence of their rejection of Christ. The speaker also highlights that the church is distinct from Israel and is characterized by its own unique relationship with God, implying that it will be raptured before the tribulation begins.

Test Your Knowledge

Scrolling down slowly will hide the answer until you can make your choice.

1.What does the preacher argue about the Church’s experience during the tribulation?

A) The Church will go through the tribulation.

B) The Church will not go through the tribulation.

C) The Church will experience partial tribulation.

D) The Church’s experience is not mentioned.

Answer: B

.

2.According to the sermon, how long is the period referred to as the 70 weeks?

A) 70 days

B) 70 months

C) 490 years

D) 70 years

Answer: C

.

3.What historical event does the preacher reference as a warning of God’s judgment?

A) The Exodus

B) The Battle of Armageddon

C) The Flood during Noah’s time

D) The Babylonian Exile

Answer: C

.

4.What is a key characteristic of the rapture, according to the preacher?

A) It is preceded by specific signs.

B) It involves the judgment of the world.

C) It concerns only the saved.

D) It occurs after the second coming.

Answer: C

.

5.What does the preacher suggest about the nature of the second coming?

A) It is imminent and has no signs.

B) It is a time of judgment and involves all people.

C) It is the same event as the rapture.

D) It is only for the Church.

Answer: B

.

6.What is one reason given for why the church will not go through the tribulation?

A) The church has already faced enough trials.

B) The nature of the church does not belong in tribulation.

C) The rapture is a myth.

D) All believers will be punished equally.

Answer: B

.

7.According to Zephaniah, what characterizes “the Day of the Lord”?

A) A day of peace and prosperity.

B) A day of wrath and distress.

C) A day when all nations will unite.

D) A day without judgment.

Answer: B

.

8.Which event does Peter reference to illustrate God’s judgment against sin?

A) The Exodus from Egypt.

B) The destruction of Sodom and Gomorrah.

C) The resurrection of Jesus.

D) The creation story.

Answer: B

.

9.Who does Jesus say will not see Him again until they acknowledge Him as Messiah?

A) Gentiles

B) His disciples

C) The people of Israel

D) Angels

Answer: C

.

10.What term is used to describe the period when Jerusalem will be under gentile control until certain prophecies are fulfilled?

A) The Great Commission

B) The Times of Gentiles

C) The Age of Grace

D) The Last Judgment

Answer: B

.

I had a couple of objections to what I learned in this lesson:

First, I believe much of today’s tolerance of Jewish supremacy and Israel’s sin over other nations comes from small insertions and side notes added to the Word of God. A repetitive and persistence downplaying of Israel’s sin with a counter call for unconditional love and acceptance from the congregation is not exactly Biblical. Never should a people who embrace sin and rebellion be given a pass. There should be no partiality. Not only is this wrong and evil, it has proven to be unhealthy for everyone involved, both Jew and Gentile. God holds Israel to a very high standard because He entrusted much to them; we should do no other. The part in question is this…

Now, [the Jews] were guilty of the death of their King. And you know you can try to pacify your conscience on that and try to be nice and loving to Jewish people, and indeed we ought to be. If any Christian has anything but love for Israel, there’s something wrong, because that’s all God has for them. That’s all Jesus ever had for them. That’s all Paul, Peter or anybody else ever had for them. Anti-Semitism of any kind is absolutely intolerable. But we cannot at the same token excuse Israel from the death of Christ. The Pope may do that; we can’t do that Biblically. The reason we can’t do that is because we have Peter’s words. Peter says, “You did it,” not once but several times. And that’s why he kept getting into trouble obviously; Jerusalem was not the safest place to make that kind of pronouncement…In Luke 21:24, he said, “Jerusalem shall be trodden down by the gentiles until the times of the gentiles be fulfilled.” Israel is being punished century after century for the rejection of Christ.

The punishment of Israel century after century for the rejection of Christ might be the scene from heaven, but from down here the punishment has been due to their unwillingness to assimilate into host nations. They always upset the apple cart. It may seem at times that they get away with this, but the prophecy points out that two thirds of the Jews will be slaughtered in the Tribulation. It points out that the Tribulation is mainly for Israel. They will get their due; God will see to that if nobody else does.

Secondly, the sermon mentions that the regathering of Israel is happening now.

Now God says, “I’m going to regather you, Israel, and I’m going to enter into judgement.” Now have you and I seen the regathering? Believe us we have, haven’t we?

I disagree. God declares that He will bring them back and He describes how He will do this. What we see today is a manmade effort. Contrast that with the way God said He would bring them back, which I won’t elaborate here, this is exactly what this “return” is. It is a manmade effort for Israel to enter the land.

Ezekiel 20:33 “As I live,” declares the Lord God, “surely with a mighty hand and with an outstretched arm and with wrath poured out, I shall be king over you.

Where is the mighty hand? Where is the outstretched arm. Greater still, where are the converted hearts? If you read Ezekiel, you will see that he compares the final return of Israel to the Exodus; he says it will be greater than what we saw regarding the Exodus. It is going to be pretty spectacular. The world has yet to witness anything like that.

But, to the preacher’s credit, and I agree with him on the following point; he does say that the Gentiles are in control.

And it has been under gentile rule ever since that time, and this is what is known as the Times of the Gentiles. Now Israel has gained back some control of its land, but not all of it…So you can’t claim that Israel is in its land in the full sense of the promise; gentiles still control it.

So, he is a bit confusing and that is unfortunate because this is where a lot of evil, passivism, and toleration for untold evil hides. The best that we can do, is preach the truth and live the truth, regardless of where it leads.

Now, let’s move on to this important study.

Listen & Read Along

See the full transcript and listen to this sermon here:

1326 Jul 22, 1973.

.

Study Guide

07-Will-The-Church-Go-Through-The-Tribulation-3

In this lesson, the following questions will be addressed:

Outline

I.Introduction
A.Overview of the topic: Will the Church go through the tribulation?
II.Biblical Prophecies of Judgment
A.Zephaniah’s prophecy of the Day of the Lord
B.Historical examples of God’s judgment (Noah, Sodom and Gomorrah)
III.The 70 Weeks Prophecy
A.Explanation of the 70 weeks as a period of years
B.Significance of the decree to restore Jerusalem
IV.Distinction Between Rapture and Second Coming
A.Characteristics of the rapture
B.Characteristics of the second coming
C.Implications for the Church
V.Conclusion
A.Summary of key points
B.Final thoughts on the Church’s position regarding the tribulation

Outline 2

I.Introduction
A.Overview of prophetic themes
B.The question posed: Will the church go through the tribulation?
II.Human Fear and Rebellion Against God
A.Recognition of human fear in relation to divine judgment
B.Historical context of rebellion against God
III.Biblical Basis for Judgment
A.Reference to 2 Peter regarding past judgments (angels, Noah, Sodom and Gomorrah)
B.Prophecy of future judgment as described in Zephaniah
IV.Nature of the Church
A.Definition and characteristics of the church
B.The church as a parenthesis in God’s plan for Israel
V.Nature of the Tribulation
A.Description of tribulation as primarily for Israel
B.Scriptural references supporting this view (Jeremiah, Matthew)
VI.Conclusion
A.Summary of arguments for pre-tribulation rapture
B.Final thoughts on God’s judgment and mercy

Study Questions

1.How does the preacher interpret the prophecies of Zephaniah in relation to the tribulation?

The preacher interprets the prophecies of Zephaniah as a forewarning of the impending judgment that will come upon the earth, particularly focusing on the Day of the Lord. Zephaniah’s prophecies highlight the severity of God’s judgment and the catastrophic events that will unfold during the tribulation period. The preacher emphasizes that these prophecies serve as a backdrop for understanding the nature of the tribulation, which is characterized by intense suffering and divine retribution, particularly aimed at Israel for their rebellion against God. This interpretation aligns with the broader theme of the sermon, which posits that the tribulation is primarily for Israel and not for the Church, underscoring the distinct roles and experiences of both in God’s redemptive plan.

.

2.What is the significance of the 70 weeks prophecy in understanding Israel’s history and future?

The significance of the 70 weeks prophecy, as discussed by the preacher, lies in its detailed outline of Israel’s historical timeline and its implications for the future. This prophecy, found in Daniel 9, indicates that a total of 490 years (70 weeks of years) is determined upon Israel to accomplish several key objectives: to finish transgression, make an end of sins, bring reconciliation for iniquity, and usher in everlasting righteousness.

The preacher highlights that this prophecy is crucial for understanding the chronological framework of Israel’s history, beginning from the decree to restore and rebuild Jerusalem, which is historically dated to March 14, 445 BC. The prophecy delineates the periods leading up to the coming of the Messiah and ultimately points to the establishment of God’s kingdom.

Moreover, the preacher argues that the 70 weeks prophecy underscores the gap between the 69th and 70th weeks, suggesting that the Church exists in this parenthetical period. This gap indicates that the final week, which is associated with the tribulation, is specifically for Israel’s judgment and restoration, reinforcing the idea that the tribulation serves a distinct purpose in God’s plan for Israel rather than for the Church.

.

3.In what ways does the preacher differentiate between the rapture and the second coming of Christ?

The preacher differentiates between the rapture and the second coming of Christ in several key ways:

1.Nature of the Events: The rapture is described as an event where Christ comes to gather His Church, involving the translation of living saints to meet Him in the air. In contrast, the second coming involves Christ returning to earth to establish His kingdom and execute judgment.
2.Location: During the rapture, the Bible indicates that believers will meet Christ in the air, while the second coming involves Christ setting His feet on the Mount of Olives, signifying His physical return to earth.
3.Participants: The rapture concerns only the saved, specifically the Church, while the second coming involves both the saved and the lost, as it is a time of judgment for all humanity.
4.Judgment: The rapture occurs without any judgment on the world, and sin continues to increase. Conversely, the second coming is preceded by specific signs and is characterized by God’s judgment on sin and the establishment of righteousness.
5.Imminence and Signs: The rapture is described as an imminent event that requires no signs or warnings, while the second coming is preceded by detailed prophetic signs that indicate its approach.
6.Timing: The preacher emphasizes that the rapture is a distinct event that occurs before the tribulation, whereas the second coming takes place after the tribulation period, marking the culmination of God’s plan for Israel and the world.

These distinctions highlight the theological understanding that the Church will not experience the tribulation, as it is a separate event from the second coming of Christ.

.

4.How does the sermon address the concept of God’s judgment throughout biblical history?

The sermon addresses the concept of God’s judgment throughout biblical history by emphasizing several key points:

1.Historical Precedents: The preacher references past instances of God’s judgment, such as the Flood, to illustrate that God has a history of judging sin. The Flood serves as a monumental example of divine judgment, where God destroyed the earth due to widespread wickedness, sparing only Noah and his family. This historical event is used to remind readers that God’s judgment is both real and inevitable .
2.The Day of the Lord: The sermon discusses the “Day of the Lord,” a term used in the Bible to describe a future time of divine judgment. This concept is linked to the tribulation, which is portrayed as a period of intense suffering and judgment upon the ungodly. The preacher cites prophecies from the Old Testament, including those from Zephaniah, to underscore the seriousness and certainty of this coming judgment .
3.Distinction Between the Righteous and the Unrighteous: The preacher makes a clear distinction between the righteous (the godly) and the unrighteous (the ungodly) in the context of judgment. It is emphasized that God knows how to deliver the godly from judgment, as seen in the example of Lot being rescued from Sodom and Gomorrah. This principle suggests that the faithful will be spared from the tribulation, which is intended for the ungodly .
4.Future Judgment: The sermon asserts that the coming tribulation is part of God’s plan to deal with sin and rebellion, particularly focusing on Israel. The preacher argues that this period of judgment is necessary for the ultimate restoration of Israel and the fulfillment of God’s promises to His people , .

Overall, the sermon presents God’s judgment as a consistent theme throughout biblical history, serving both as a warning and a means of purification for His people, while also affirming the hope of deliverance for the righteous.

.

5.What implications does the preacher suggest regarding the Church’s experience during the tribulation?

The preacher suggests several implications regarding the Church’s experience during the tribulation:

1.Absence from the Tribulation: The primary implication is that the Church will not go through the tribulation. The preacher argues that the tribulation is specifically a time of judgment for the ungodly and is primarily focused on Israel. Therefore, the Church, being distinct from Israel, is not included in this period of suffering and judgment.
2.Pre-Tribulation Rapture: The preacher advocates for a pre-tribulation rapture, meaning that believers will be taken up to meet Christ before the tribulation begins. This belief is based on the nature of the Church and the nature of the tribulation itself, which the preacher describes as a time designated for Israel and the ungodly.
3.God’s Deliverance: The preacher emphasizes that God knows how to deliver the godly from times of judgment. This is illustrated through biblical examples, such as the rescue of Lot from Sodom and Gomorrah. The implication here is that the Church, as the body of Christ, will be spared from the tribulation, reinforcing the idea that believers will be protected from God’s wrath .
4.Focus on Israel: The preacher points out that the tribulation is fundamentally about God’s dealings with Israel, often referred to as “Jacob’s trouble.” This indicates that the Church’s experience is separate from the events that will unfold during the tribulation, which are intended to bring Israel to repentance and restoration .
5.Hope and Assurance: The implication of the Church’s absence from the tribulation provides hope and assurance to believers. The preacher suggests that this belief encourages Christians to live in anticipation of Christ’s return and to remain faithful, knowing that they will be with Him during the time of judgment on the ungodly.

Overall, the preacher presents a view that emphasizes the Church’s deliverance and distinct identity in relation to the tribulation, highlighting a future hope for believers.

.

6.What biblical passages does the speaker reference to support the argument that God judges sin?

The speaker references several biblical passages to support the argument that God judges sin, emphasizing God’s historical judgments and prophecies of future judgment. Key passages include:

 2 Peter 2:4-6 – This passage illustrates God’s judgment on angels who sinned, the ancient world during Noah’s time, and the cities of Sodom and Gomorrah, highlighting that God does not spare those who rebel against Him.
 2 Peter 3:10 – The speaker cites this verse to indicate that the Day of the Lord will come unexpectedly, resulting in the destruction of the heavens and earth by fire, reinforcing the certainty of divine judgment.
 Zephaniah 1:14-17 – The speaker uses this prophecy to describe the coming “Day of the Lord” as a day of wrath, trouble, and distress, specifically aimed at those who have sinned against God.
 Matthew 23:38-39 – Here, Jesus states that Jerusalem will be left desolate until the people acknowledge Him as their Messiah, indicating a judgment for their rejection of Him.
 Luke 21:24 – This passage mentions that Jerusalem will be trodden down by Gentiles until the times of the Gentiles are fulfilled, further emphasizing Israel’s punishment for rejecting Christ.
 Ezekiel 20:33 – The speaker refers to this verse to show God’s promise to judge Israel face-to-face as part of His plan for their restoration after judgment.

These passages collectively underscore the theme that God has consistently judged sin throughout history and will continue to do so in future prophetic events.

.

7.How does the speaker differentiate between the church and Israel in terms of their relationship with God?

The speaker differentiates between the church and Israel in several key ways regarding their relationship with God:

1.Distinct Roles in God’s Plan: The speaker emphasizes that the church and Israel have different roles within God’s overarching plan. The church is viewed as a “parenthesis” in God’s dealings with Israel, meaning that the church’s existence and mission are separate from God’s covenant promises to Israel.
2.Nature of the Covenant: The speaker highlights that Israel operates under the Old Covenant, which includes specific promises and laws given to them by God. In contrast, the church is established under the New Covenant through Jesus Christ, characterized by grace and faith rather than adherence to the law.
3.Relationship with Christ: The church is described as having a unique relationship with Christ, being referred to as the “Body of Christ.” This signifies a close, intimate connection where believers are united with Christ in a way that is distinct from Israel’s relationship with God.
4.Judgment and Restoration: The speaker argues that while Israel will face judgment for its rejection of Christ, the church is promised deliverance from this tribulation period through the rapture. This distinction underscores that the tribulation is primarily intended for Israel as part of their restoration process rather than for the church.
5.Prophetic Fulfillment: The speaker points out that many biblical prophecies concerning judgment and restoration are directed specifically at Israel. The church is seen as not being subject to these prophetic fulfillments, which further differentiates its relationship with God from that of Israel.

Overall, these distinctions illustrate a theological framework where the church and Israel are viewed as separate entities with unique identities and destinies in God’s divine plan.

.

8.What are the implications of viewing the tribulation as primarily a time for Israel?

Viewing the tribulation primarily as a time for Israel carries several significant implications:

1.Focus on God’s Judgment: The tribulation is seen as a period of divine judgment specifically aimed at Israel for its historical rejection of Christ. This interpretation emphasizes that the suffering and trials during this time are not random but are a direct consequence of Israel’s disobedience and rebellion against God.
2.Fulfillment of Prophecy: This perspective aligns with various Old Testament prophecies that predict a time of trouble for Israel, often referred to as “Jacob’s trouble” (Jeremiah 30:7). It suggests that the tribulation is a fulfillment of these prophecies, reinforcing the idea that God is actively involved in the history and destiny of Israel.
3.Distinction Between Israel and the Church: By viewing the tribulation as primarily for Israel, it reinforces the theological distinction between the church and Israel. The church is perceived as having a different role and relationship with God, particularly in terms of salvation and eschatological events. This distinction supports the belief in a pre-tribulation rapture for the church, suggesting that believers will be spared from this time of judgment.
4.Restoration of Israel: The tribulation is also seen as a necessary precursor to the eventual restoration of Israel. This period of suffering is viewed as a means through which God will bring about repentance among the Jewish people, leading to their recognition of Jesus as the Messiah. Thus, it serves both as judgment and as a catalyst for spiritual renewal.
5.Implications for Christian Attitudes: Understanding the tribulation in this context may influence Christian attitudes toward Israel today. It can foster a sense of urgency regarding evangelism and support for Jewish people, recognizing their unique place in God’s plan while also affirming the need for reconciliation with Christ.

In summary, viewing the tribulation as primarily a time for Israel underscores themes of divine judgment, prophetic fulfillment, distinct roles within God’s plan, restoration, and influences on contemporary Christian perspectives regarding Israel.

.

9.In what ways does the speaker argue that historical judgments foreshadow future events?

The speaker argues that historical judgments foreshadow future events in several ways:

1.Historical Precedents of Judgment: The speaker references biblical examples of God’s judgment throughout history, such as the punishment of angels who sinned, the Flood during Noah’s time, and the destruction of Sodom and Gomorrah. These events serve as precedents that illustrate God’s consistent response to sin and rebellion. The speaker emphasizes that if God judged these groups, it is foolish to believe He will not judge humanity again in the future.
2.Prophetic Warnings: The speaker cites 2 Peter 3:10, which warns that the Day of the Lord will come unexpectedly, resulting in a fiery judgment of the earth. This serves as a reminder that past judgments are not isolated incidents but part of a larger pattern of divine justice that will culminate in future events.
3.Zephaniah’s Prophecy: The speaker discusses the prophecy from Zephaniah, which describes a coming “Day of the Lord” characterized by wrath, trouble, and distress. This prophecy is presented as a foreshadowing of the tribulation period, indicating that just as God has judged in the past, He will do so again during this future time of reckoning. The vivid imagery used in Zephaniah’s description aligns with the catastrophic events expected during the tribulation.
4.Judgment as a Response to Rebellion: The speaker highlights that historical judgments serve to remind humanity of God’s holiness and justice. By drawing parallels between past judgments and future tribulation, the speaker argues that God’s judgment is a direct response to rebellion against Him, reinforcing the idea that those who reject God will face consequences.
5.Inevitability of Future Judgment: The speaker concludes that God’s historical actions demonstrate His commitment to justice and foreshadow inevitable future judgments. This perspective encourages believers to recognize the seriousness of sin and the certainty of divine accountability, particularly for Israel during the tribulation period.

Overall, these arguments illustrate how historical judgments are seen as both warnings and confirmations of God’s unchanging nature regarding sin and judgment, setting the stage for future prophetic fulfillments.

.

10.How does understanding the nature of the church influence beliefs about its role during the tribulation?

Understanding the nature of the church significantly influences beliefs about its role during the tribulation in several ways:

1.Distinct Identity: The speaker emphasizes that the church is a distinct entity from Israel, characterized by its unique relationship with Christ. This distinction implies that the church does not belong in the tribulation, which is viewed as a time specifically designated for Israel’s judgment and restoration. The church’s identity as the “Body of Christ” suggests it has a different purpose and destiny compared to Israel.
2.Pre-Tribulation Rapture: The belief in a pre-tribulation rapture is supported by the church’s nature. The speaker argues that because the church is seen as a “parenthesis” in God’s plan for Israel, it will be removed from the earth before the tribulation begins. This understanding fosters confidence among believers that they will be spared from the trials and judgments associated with this period.
3.Historical Context: The speaker discusses how the church began at Pentecost and has its own timeline separate from Israel’s prophetic history. This historical context reinforces the idea that the church’s role is not to endure the tribulation but rather to fulfill its mission of evangelism and discipleship until it is taken up to heaven.
4.Nature of God’s Judgment: Viewing the tribulation as primarily for Israel aligns with the understanding that God’s judgment during this time is a response to Israel’s rejection of Christ. Since the church consists of those who have accepted Christ, it is seen as exempt from this judgment, further solidifying its role as separate from Israel during this critical period.
5.Eschatological Implications: The nature of the church influences eschatological beliefs, including views on end-time events. By understanding that the church will not experience tribulation, believers can focus on hope and anticipation for Christ’s return rather than fear of impending judgment. This perspective encourages a proactive faith, emphasizing readiness for Christ’s coming rather than anxiety over tribulation.

In summary, understanding the nature of the church shapes beliefs about its role during the tribulation by highlighting its distinct identity, supporting pre-tribulation rapture theology, providing historical context, clarifying God’s judgment focus, and influencing eschatological outlooks.

.

To see all the lessons in this series click on the 1973 Prophecy tag below.