Category Archives: My Government

My Government refers to things related to my government.

$600 Trillion of What?



At the core then is a simple question: which is more important — people or money? I thought the United States Constitution made that clear and gave Americans the 2d, 4th, 5th, 9th and 14th Amendments to make sure they could enforce it. But now the answer has become hopelessly and intentionally obscured. -Neil F Garfield


The mortgage crisis merely kicked off the debate. Mortgage backed securities are now widely regarded as the largest asset class in the world, indeed in world history. Small wonder. According to reports from the industry, they accounted for $125 Trillion in….what?


By allowing banks to create money, the world governments have accidentally created a Frankenstein that under current rules cannot be undone. More than $600 trillion in credit derivatives have been issued which were, until recently, regarded as “cash equivalent.” In plain language the private banks were issuing currency pretending that it was “backed” by government issued currency. But they issued as much as their printing presses could endure.

The problem is that the $600 trillion is vastly in excess of the $50 trillion in currency issued by all world governments. The problem is exacerbated by the fact that we really don’t know the terms of those derivatives since, according to the financial industry, each one has its own characteristics. Nobody knows what they are really worth and nobody knows whether some of them or most of them cancel each other out as “hedge” products.

But what we DO know is that central banks are having very little effect on the economies of the world — because their actions might effect, collectively, perhaps a few trillion dollars worth of currency while the rest of the world is trying to come to terms with a hundred times that amount.

What does this have to do with mortgages? Everything. About a quarter of these “assets” are based upon the presumption that somewhere there are at least $14 trillion in actual loans that are secured by mortgages on real property. If those mortgages disappear — POOF! — the actual value of the $125 trillion in assets becomes recognized for what it always was —- zero. The real question is not who takes that loss — although it is nothing to sniff at —- the real question becomes how do we cover up the fact that there IS such a loss, because with only $50 trillion in world currency, there literally isn’t enough money in the world to pay for it.

So the burden falling on homeowners and investors is that, as we have stated before, emperor never had any clothes but we must pretend that the clothes are real until we figure something else out.  In the meanwhile, if 50 million people are ejected from their homes under invalid documents that were fraudulently obtained, so be it.

The media would have us believe that the banks are reluctant to take the loss which is true enough. They tell us that if the foreclosures proceed, the recognition of those losses can be delayed because they still have the property which they acquired in illegal “credit” bids. But the real problem is not whether there are $500-$800 billion in losses sitting inchoate on the balance sheets of megabanks. The real problem is that the true loss figure might be as much as $125 trillion, which will put the rest of the $600 trillion in credit derivatives into question.

Everything was “securitized” and if the mortgages are any indication they didn’t follow normal legal procedure in transferring the obligations or notes. The problem with identification of the creditor and the amount of the actual obligation still outstanding in mortgage loans turns out to be the tip of an even larger iceberg. If the same questions apply to credit cards, consumer loans, student loans, auto loans and other types of credit extended to varying classes of people, and the same defects exist where the creditors are hopelessly obscured and the accounting for the remaining obligation is not possible, the value of the entire $600 trillion comes into question — and the question is whether that represents a world-wide loss and if so, who takes that loss?

So homeowners in America are being used as the scape goat for the excesses of world-wide finance that was conducted in the world of shadow banking, which turns out to be twelve times bigger than the real banking world. The guarantees of due process, justice for all and the American way are put on hold because the governments, who were asleep at the switch for the last 30 years, simply don’t know what to do.

Alan Greenspan who shares a considerable amount of the blame for this state of affairs admitted in interviews that with over a 100 PhD’s at his disposal he still doesn’t understand the content of the derivatives. That is what I mean by hopelessly obscured and it isn’t the fault of homeowners or the investors. They were used as pawns in a much larger scheme.

At the core then is a simple question: which is more important — people or money? I thought the United States Constitution made that clear and gave Americans the 2d, 4th, 5th, 9th and 14th Amendments to make sure they could enforce it. But now the answer has become hopelessly and intentionally obscured.
Get Clipmarks – The easiest way to email text, images and videos you find on the web.
Sent with Clipmarks

70+ Websites Gone! More Slated to Go

 clipped from www.naturalnews.com

US Government seizure of the internet has begun; DHS takes over 76 websites


(NaturalNews) As part of a new expansion of government power over information, the Department of Homeland Security has begun seizing and shutting down internet websites (web domains) without due process or a proper trial. DHS simply seizes web domains that it wants to and posts an ominous “Department of Justice” logo on the web site. See an example at http://torrent-finder.com

Over 75 websites were seized and shut down last week, and there is no indication that the government will stop such efforts. Right now, their focus is websites that they claim “violate copyrights,” yet the torrent-finder.com website that was seized by DHS contained no copyrighted content whatsoever. It was merely a search engine website that linked to destinations where people could access copyrighted content. Google also links to copyrighted content — does that mean the feds will soon seize Google, too?

These seizures were conducted on the basis of language in the DMCA law, which is vastly overreaching in its powers (it was passed to appease the music recording industry and the RIAA). Even so, the U.S. Senate is right now considering passing yet another law — COICA — the Combating Online Infringement and Counterfeits Act (http://www.rawstory.com/rs/2010/11/…), a new law that would give the federal government even more power to shut down websites it opposed.

Read more about COICA here: http://www.usa-anti-communist.com/w…


Here’s the list of 19 US Senators who voted to censor the internet via the COICA bill: http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20…

Government could shut down alternative health websites


Where is all this going? Today the U.S. government is targeting websites focused on copyright violations, but if the public tolerates this government-sponsored censorship of the web, it’s only a matter of time before these government powers are expanded to control the content of the internet.

Over the last few years, several U.S. Senators have already attempted to outlaw vitamins and nutritional supplements. One lawmaker even suggested that “alternative health” information should be outlawed on the internet in order to “protect” people from information that isn’t aligned with the drugs-and-surgery approach to sick care. It’s only a matter of time, it seems, before the U.S. government uses its new power of seizing internet websites as an information warfare weapon to silence anyone who opposes FDA and the Big Pharma agenda.

In fact, under these new laws, there’s no limit to what websites the U.S. government could choose to seize and shut down. This is the beginning of the federal takeover of the internet, where all websites that don’t fall in line with “official” government-approved information are now potential targets of DHS seizures.

One music website seized by DHS — RapGodFather.com — was seized merely because its users posted comments linking to file-sharing websites (http://www.rawstory.com/rs/2010/11/…). The site had 150,000 members, but as of today, it is the property of “Homeland Security Investigations.” (http://rapgodfathers.com/)

See the TorrentFreak.com news report on this important story here: http://torrentfreak.com/music-linki…

All websites using the word “Face” could soon be seized


The reach of tyrants knows no limits. As widely reported throughout the popular press last week, the US Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) has assigned Facebook a trademark monopoly over the word “Face.” (http://techcrunch.com/2010/11/23/pa…) This means that any website using the word “face” could theoretically be seized by the DHS under the DMCA.

Lest you think this is some impossible exaggeration of the law, keep in mind that governments always misuse laws to go far beyond their original intended purpose. The RICO Act, for example, which was originally passed in 1970 to combat the mafia, is now used nearly every day against individuals and small businesses (http://www.ricoact.com).

Similarly, the Patriot Act signed into law by President Bush after the 9/11 attacks was originally intended to be applied to international terrorists. But now in the United States, it is routinely used against animal rights activists and environmental protection groups (http://www.aclu.org/national-securi…).

These rogue abuses of federal law create a pattern of expanding government powers that increasingly threaten the Constitutional rights of American citizens. To seize a person’s website without due process is both a violation of that person’s First Amendment rights (Free Speech) as well as their Fifth Amendment rights.

The Fifth Amendment states:

No person shall be… deprived of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor shall private property be taken for public use, without just compensation.

And yet this seizure of websites by the DHS is doing precisely that — depriving people of property without due process of law.

The U.S. federal government, as we have increasingly seen through the actions of the TSA, DEA and DHS, does not recognize nor honor the Bill of Rights. Nor does it believe the U.S. Constitution has any authority whatsoever. The upshot of this is that all Americans citizens are now living under a system of government tyranny, where government agents may molest you at the airports or seize your website if they don’t like what you’re saying online.

Take action: Sign the petition


Help stop the government takeover of the internet. Sign this petition:


In order to protect your access to NaturalNews.com and stay in contact with us in case the DHS ever attempts to seize our web domain, be sure to join our email list by entering your email address at http://www.naturalnews.com/ReaderRe…
Get Clipmarks – The easiest way to email text, images and videos you find on the web.
Sent with Clipmarks

Facebook Protest Halts $100 Million Construction Project

 clipped from www.allfacebook.com

Facebook has become the anti-industry standard for protesting businesses, and industries that haven’t gotten wise to social media have suffered. Case in point: a $100 million housing development in Long Island was brought to a  halt by local residents’ postings online.

Up until recently, people opposed to a commercial real estate plan used to circulate petitions to submit to local government, then organize on-site protests of projects that make it through a city hall unopposed. Obviously, Facebook reaches a larger audience much more quickly and effectively.


Given the large price tags attached to commercial real estate projects, it’s kind of surprising that the industry is only just now getting wise to social media.


Like Bryan Ellis states on its corporate blog, most Facebook pages having to do with commercial real estate are the work of protesters rather than the industry:


Recently, a band of residents in Huntington Station (located on Long Island) successfully marshaled opposition to and blocked a $100 million housing development. Most experts believe that the counter-initiative succeeded largely because developers were not really aware of the scale or potential impact of the campaign and did not address it through like media.


This incident became a talking point a Nassau County, NY Planning Commission public hearing focusing on economic problems in the area. Losing a project like the one in Huntington Station means not getting hundreds of new jobs and  scads of tax revenues.


So that’s why Bryan Ellis blogs that city planners and real estate developers need to get wise to Facebook and Twitter. The industry could use social networks to counteract any negative messaging that the protesters are putting out, the commercial realtor argues.


Readers, how do you think Facebook users would react to this genre of corporate message? What sort of strategies should commercial realty concerns use in approaching social media?

Get Clipmarks – The easiest way to email text, images and videos you find on the web.
Sent with Clipmarks

Rational Portrait of the Mastermind (INTJ)

Another opinion of my personality.

 clipped from keirsey.com

Portrait of the INTJ - Keirsey's Rational Mastermind


Please Understand Me II, by David Keirsey, PhD All Rationals are good at planning operations, but Masterminds are head and shoulders above all the rest in contingency planning. Complex operations involve many steps or stages, one following another in a necessary progression, and Masterminds are naturally able to grasp how each one leads to the next, and to prepare alternatives for difficulties that are likely to arise any step of the way. Trying to anticipate every contingency, Masterminds never set off on their current project without a Plan A firmly in mind, but they are always prepared to switch to Plan B or C or D if need be.


Masterminds are rare, comprising no more than one to two percent of the population, and they are rarely encountered outside their office, factory, school, or laboratory. Although they are highly capable leaders, Masterminds are not at all eager to take command, preferring to stay in the background until others demonstrate their inability to lead. Once they take charge, however, they are thoroughgoing pragmatists. Masterminds are certain that efficiency is indispensable in a well-run organization, and if they encounter inefficiency — any waste of human and material resources — they are quick to realign operations and reassign personnel. Masterminds do not feel bound by established rules and procedures, and traditional authority does not impress them, nor do slogans or catchwords. Only ideas that make sense to them are adopted; those that don’t, aren’t, no matter who thought of them. Remember, their aim is always maximum efficiency.


Communication tip for an INTJ employee with an Artisan boss In their careers, Masterminds usually rise to positions of responsibility, for they work long and hard and are dedicated in their pursuit of goals, sparing neither their own time and effort nor that of their colleagues and employees. Problem-solving is highly stimulating to Masterminds, who love responding to tangled systems that require careful sorting out. Ordinarily, they verbalize the positive and avoid comments of a negative nature; they are more interested in moving an organization forward than dwelling on mistakes of the past.


Masterminds tend to be much more definite and self-confident than other Rationals, having usually developed a very strong will. Decisions come easily to them; in fact, they can hardly rest until they have things settled and decided. But before they decide anything, they must do the research. Masterminds are highly theoretical, but they insist on looking at all available data before they embrace an idea, and they are suspicious of any statement that is based on shoddy research, or that is not checked against reality.

Get Clipmarks – The easiest way to email text, images and videos you find on the web.
Sent with Clipmarks

Jung Career Indicator

 clipped from www.humanmetrics.com
Identify Your Career with
Jung Career Indicator™

YOUR TYPE
I N T J
Strength of the preferences %
78 62 38 11


Jung Career Indicator™ determines careers most suitable for your type from personality type standpoint. Based on your personality type, the following is a list of your most suitable occupations along with some examples of educational institutions, where you can receive a relevant degree or training. Please click institution name for more information. http://www.humanmetrics.com/cgi-win/JTypes1.htm for a list of occupations most suitable for you from your personality type standpoint. For each of occupations, there are some examples of educational institutions, where you can receive a relevant degree or training.”> Invite your friends to discover most suitable for them careers.

Science/Technical

Natural Science

Natural Science Education

Information System Specialist

Computer Programming

Social Service

Lawyer (corporative)

Librarian

Famous people of your particular type

Isaac Newton, Niels Bohr, C. G. Jung, Michel de Montaigne, Michel Nostradamus, Ada Lovelace
Get Clipmarks – The easiest way to email text, images and videos you find on the web.
Sent with Clipmarks

I Resemble These Remarks

The result of a personality test led me to this description. Some of which I can relate to. It is rather helpful in locating my abrasiveness so I may smooth those edges.

 clipped from typelogic.com

Introverted iNtuitive Thinking Judging
by Marina Margaret Heiss


Profile: INTJ
Revision: 3.1
Date of Revision: 17 Oct 2009


To outsiders, INTJs may appear to project an aura of “definiteness”, of self-confidence. This self-confidence, sometimes mistaken for simple arrogance by the less decisive, is actually of a very specific rather than a general nature; its source lies in the specialized knowledge systems that most INTJs start building at an early age. When it comes to their own areas of expertise — and INTJs can have several — they will be able to tell you almost immediately whether or not they can help you, and if so, how. INTJs know what they know, and perhaps still more importantly, they know what they don’t know.


INTJs are perfectionists, with a seemingly endless capacity for improving upon anything that takes their interest. What prevents them from becoming chronically bogged down in this pursuit of perfection is the pragmatism so characteristic of the type: INTJs apply (often ruthlessly) the criterion “Does it work?” to everything from their own research efforts to the prevailing social norms. This in turn produces an unusual independence of mind, freeing the INTJ from the constraints of authority, convention, or sentiment for its own sake.


INTJs are known as the “Systems Builders” of the types, perhaps in part because they possess the unusual trait combination of imagination and reliability. Whatever system an INTJ happens to be working on is for them the equivalent of a moral cause to an INFJ; both perfectionism and disregard for authority may come into play, as INTJs can be unsparing of both themselves and the others on the project. Anyone considered to be “slacking,” including superiors, will lose their respect — and will generally be made aware of this; INTJs have also been known to take it upon themselves to implement critical decisions without consulting their supervisors or co-workers. On the other hand, they do tend to be scrupulous and even-handed about recognizing the individual contributions that have gone into a project, and have a gift for seizing opportunities which others might not even notice.


In the broadest terms, what INTJs “do” tends to be what they “know”. Typical INTJ career choices are in the sciences and engineering, but they can be found wherever a combination of intellect and incisiveness are required (e.g., law, some areas of academia). INTJs can rise to management positions when they are willing to invest time in marketing their abilities as well as enhancing them, and (whether for the sake of ambition or the desire for privacy) many also find it useful to learn to simulate some degree of surface conformism in order to mask their inherent unconventionality.


Personal relationships, particularly romantic ones, can be the INTJ’s Achilles heel. While they are capable of caring deeply for others (usually a select few), and are willing to spend a great deal of time and effort on a relationship, the knowledge and self-confidence that make them so successful in other areas can suddenly abandon or mislead them in interpersonal situations.


This happens in part because many INTJs do not readily grasp the social rituals; for instance, they tend to have little patience and less understanding of such things as small talk and flirtation (which most types consider half the fun of a relationship). To complicate matters, INTJs are usually extremely private people, and can often be naturally impassive as well, which makes them easy to misread and misunderstand. Perhaps the most fundamental problem, however, is that INTJs really want people to make sense. 🙂 This sometimes results in a peculiar naivete’, paralleling that of many Fs — only instead of expecting inexhaustible affection and empathy from a romantic relationship, the INTJ will expect inexhaustible reasonability and directness.


Probably the strongest INTJ assets in the interpersonal area are their intuitive abilities and their willingness to “work at” a relationship. Although as Ts they do not always have the kind of natural empathy that many Fs do, the Intuitive function can often act as a good substitute by synthesizing the probable meanings behind such things as tone of voice, turn of phrase, and facial expression. This ability can then be honed and directed by consistent, repeated efforts to understand and support those they care about, and those relationships which ultimately do become established with an INTJ tend to be characterized by their robustness, stability, and good communications.


Functional Analysis
by Joe Butt


Introverted iNtuition

INTJs are idea people. Anything is possible; everything is negotiable. Whatever the outer circumstances, INTJs are ever perceiving inner pattern-forms and using real-world materials to operationalize them. Others may see what is and wonder why; INTJs see what might be and say “Why not?!” Paradoxes, antinomies, and other contradictory phenomena aptly express these intuitors’ amusement at those whom they feel may be taking a particular view of reality too seriously. INTJs enjoy developing unique solutions to complex problems.

Extraverted Thinking

Thinking in this auxiliary role is a workhorse. Closure is the payoff for efforts expended. Evaluation begs diagnosis; product drives process. As they come to light, Thinking tends, protects, affirms and directs iNtuition’s offspring, fully equipping them for fulfilling and useful lives. A faithful pedagogue, Thinking argues not so much on its own behalf, but in defense of its charges. And through this process these impressionable ideas take on the likeness of their master.

Introverted Feeling

Feeling has a modest inner room, two doors down from the Most Imminent iNtuition. It doesn’t get out much, but lends its influence on behalf of causes which are Good and Worthy and Humane. We may catch a glimpse of it in the unspoken attitude of good will, or the gracious smile or nod. Some question the existence of Feeling in this type, yet its unseen balance to Thinking is a cardinal dimension in the full measure of the INTJ’s soul.

Extraverted Sensing

Sensing serves with a good will, or not at all. As other inferior functions, it has only a rudimentary awareness of context, amount or degree. Thus INTJs sweat the details or, at times, omit them. “I’ve made up my mind, don’t confuse me with the facts” could well have been said by an INTJ on a mission. Sensing’s extraverted attitude is evident in this type’s bent to savor sensations rather than to merely categorize them. Indiscretions of indulgence are likely an expression of the unconscious vengeance of the inferior.


Famous INTJs:


Susan B. Anthony
Lance Armstrong
Arthur Ashe, tennis champion
Augustus Caesar (Gaius Julius Caesar Octavianus)
Jane Austen (Pride and Prejudice)
Dan Aykroyd (The Blues Brothers)
William J. Bennett, “drug czar”
William F. Buckley, Jr.
Raymond Burr (Perry Mason, Ironsides)
Chevy Chase (Cornelius Crane) (Fletch)
Katie Couric
Phil Donahue
Michael Dukakis, governor of Mass., 1988 U.S. Dem. pres. candidate
Richard Gere (Pretty Woman)
Rudy Giuliani, former New York City mayor
Greg Gumbel, television sportscaster
Hannibal, Carthaginian military leader
Veronica Hamel (Hill Street Blues)
Angela Lansbury (Murder, She Wrote)
Orel Leonard Hershiser, IV
Peter Jennings
Charles Everett Koop
Ivan Lendl
C. S. Lewis (The Chronicles of Narnia)
Joan Lunden
Edwin Moses, U.S. olympian (hurdles)
Martina Navratilova
Michelle Obama
General Colin Powell, former US Secretary of State
Charles Rangel, US Representative, D-N.Y.
Pernell Roberts (Bonanza)
Donald Rumsfeld, former US Secretary of Defense
Hillary Clinton, US Secretary of State
Arnold Schwarzenegger, Governor of California
Josephine Tey (Elizabeth Mackintosh), mystery writer (Brat Farrar)

U.S. Presidents:
Chester A. Arthur
Calvin Coolidge
Thomas Jefferson
John F. Kennedy
James K. Polk
Woodrow Wilson

Fictional:


Cassius (Julius Caesar)
Mr. Darcy (Pride and Prejudice)
Gandalf the Grey (J. R. R. Tolkein’s Middle Earth books)
Hannibal Lecter (Silence of the Lambs)
Professor Moriarty, Sherlock Holmes’ nemesis
Ensign Ro (Star Trek–the Next Generation)
Rosencrantz and Guildenstern (Hamlet)
George Smiley, John le Carre’s master spy
Clarice Starling (Silence of the Lambs)


Copyright © 1996-2010 by Marina Margaret Heiss and Joe Butt

Get Clipmarks – The easiest way to email text, images and videos you find on the web.
Sent with Clipmarks

Jung Typology Test

A quick 68 question test that I think is about 75% correct in evaluating me.

 clipped from www.humanmetrics.com
HUMANMETRICS

Jung Typology Test

Your Type is
INTJ

Introverted Intuitive Thinking Judging
Strength of the preferences %
78 62 38 11


Qualitative analysis of your type formula

You are:

  • very expressed introvert
  • distinctively expressed intuitive personality
  • moderately expressed thinking personality
  • slightly expressed judging personality

Get Clipmarks – The easiest way to email text, images and videos you find on the web.
Sent with Clipmarks