Wikipedia Blacklists Trump Supporters

the Epoch Times and conservative outlet the Gateway Pundit have been banned from use as reliable sources on Wikipedia in the latest cases of news outlets that support President Trump being banned from the online encyclopedia.

With both Epoch Times and Gateway Pundit, the offense that got them banned was challenging the predominant narrative about the Russia collusion hoax and raising concerns about the propriety of the investigation into the Trump campaign, where these outlets proved more valid in their reporting than sources deemed “reliable” on Wikipedia. That this would prompt Wikipedia editors to ban the outlets is consistent with wider efforts to spin the outcome of Special Counsel Robert Mueller’s investigation, which discredited the collusion allegations, and to spin the impeachment narrative on Ukraine against Trump. Such efforts are also consistent with Wikipedia’s significant left-wing bias.

Wikipedia Blacklists Epoch Times, Gateway Pundit for Russiagate Criticism | Breitbart

2020 Presidential Candidates Stance on Assange

Where Do They Stand? 2020 Presidential Candidates on the World’s Most Persecuted Journalist – Action 4 Assange
https://action4assange.com/wheredotheystand2020/
Behind what appears to be the height of political tensions in the United States is a singular political party—a class of individuals who not only share a distinct and lenient set of rules and regulations exclusive to only them, but a great disdain for anyone willing to expose it.

Too often those who exist in this elite class infiltrate the election cycles—and sometimes, even rig them.

It is said that the correlation of a candidate’s campaign promises and his or her voting record and policy implementation can indicate his or her true intentions. But once the public becomes aware, it is too late.

Much can be revealed about a candidate’s intent based upon his or her perspective on how to treat the ultimate check on power or perhaps how to treat the world’s most persecuted journalist. They both are the same, and his name is Julian Assange.

by Taylor Hudak

Even Rome protected speech for Jesus and Paul

Action For Assange

Does it matter that the most important journalist in the world thus far is being persecuted?

I would seriously, seriously, seriously consider voting for any candidate if he/she/it defended Assange.  I would be a single-issue voter, but if you can’t access truth then how does anything else ultimately matter in a help yourself to any form of government like ours?